Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

mouseholder.com

The domain name MouseHolder.com is for sale

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

191 ms

mouseholder.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mouseholder.com now to see the best up-to-date Mouse Holder content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mouseholder.com

The domain name MouseHolder.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit mouseholder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mouseholder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mouseholder.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mouseholder.com

1584 ms

respstyle2.php

26 ms

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

71 ms

js.cookie-2.0.2.js

46 ms

dynresp.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Mouseholder.com, 23% (11 requests) were made to Thumbs.ebaystatic.com and 21% (10 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Mouseholder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.2 kB (41%)

Content Size

248.9 kB

After Optimization

145.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Mouseholder.com main page is 248.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 105.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 42.2 kB
  • After minification 41.6 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 105.0 kB
  • After minification 100.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mouse Holder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 99.3 kB
  • After compression 35.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (28%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mouse Holder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mouseholder.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

mouseholder.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mouseholder.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mouseholder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mouseholder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mouse Holder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: