Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

518 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

279 ms

movieholder.com screenshot

About Website

Visit movieholder.com now to see the best up-to-date Movieholder content for Thailand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about movieholder.com

Visit movieholder.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Movieholder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 518 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

movieholder.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,260 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

movieholder.com

518 ms

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

slate.min.css

34 ms

styles.css

33 ms

typeahead.css

220 ms

Our browser made a total of 198 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (187 requests) were addressed to the original Movieholder.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Movieholder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 646.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Movieholder.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 197.5 kB

  • Original 219.6 kB
  • After minification 193.7 kB
  • After compression 22.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 58.9 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Movieholder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 179.1 kB

  • Original 266.0 kB
  • After minification 266.0 kB
  • After compression 86.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 210.8 kB

  • Original 251.6 kB
  • After minification 249.3 kB
  • After compression 40.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Movieholder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (6%)

Requests Now

195

After Optimization

183

The browser has sent 195 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Movieholder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

movieholder.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

movieholder.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

movieholder.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    TH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Movieholder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Thai. Our system also found out that Movieholder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Movieholder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: