Tools & Wizards About Us
mpil.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

mpil.in

MPIL

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

242 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

297 ms

mpil.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing MPIL content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mpil.in

Visit mpil.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Mpil.in page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mpil.in performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.564

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.4 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mpil.in

242 ms

bootstrap.min.css

45 ms

font-awesome.min.css

51 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

74 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Mpil.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Mpil.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 319.2 kB (2%)

Content Size

17.3 MB

After Optimization

17.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mpil.in main page is 17.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 17.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 51.7 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.5 kB, which is 61% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 243.7 kB

  • Original 17.1 MB
  • After minification 16.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MPIL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

  • Original 67.0 kB
  • After minification 67.0 kB
  • After compression 52.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mpil.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (19%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

48

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MPIL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mpil.in

mpil.in

242 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

45 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

51 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

74 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

147 ms

aos.css

aos.css

150 ms

style.css

style.css

152 ms

media.css

media.css

158 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

49 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

49 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

241 ms

aos.js

aos.js

199 ms

jquery.easeScroll.js

jquery.easeScroll.js

215 ms

custom.js

custom.js

220 ms

phone-call.png

phone-call.png

223 ms

envelope.png

envelope.png

233 ms

logo.png

logo.png

306 ms

bann1.png

bann1.png

1157 ms

bann2.png

bann2.png

1184 ms

bann3.png

bann3.png

821 ms

bann4.png

bann4.png

866 ms

bann5.png

bann5.png

727 ms

bann6.png

bann6.png

911 ms

bann7.png

bann7.png

818 ms

bann9.png

bann9.png

1857 ms

bann8.png

bann8.png

1130 ms

bann11.png

bann11.png

1025 ms

bann10.png

bann10.png

1062 ms

slide10.png

slide10.png

1108 ms

roofing-cladding.png

roofing-cladding.png

1137 ms

deck-panels-metal-deck.png

deck-panels-metal-deck.png

1188 ms

purlins-channels.png

purlins-channels.png

1205 ms

beams-rafters.png

beams-rafters.png

1212 ms

components-accessories.png

components-accessories.png

1227 ms

module-mounting-systems.png

module-mounting-systems.png

1256 ms

jsw-dolvi-project.png

jsw-dolvi-project.png

1266 ms

ambuja-cement1.png

ambuja-cement1.png

1280 ms

mmrda-metro-station.png

mmrda-metro-station.png

1286 ms

zuari.png

zuari.png

1301 ms

sahara-star-hotel.png

sahara-star-hotel.png

1330 ms

airport-terminal-t2-1.png

airport-terminal-t2-1.png

1346 ms

airport-hangar.png

airport-hangar.png

1291 ms

airport-terminal-t2.png

airport-terminal-t2.png

1223 ms

bg6.png

bg6.png

1232 ms

jsw.png

jsw.png

1259 ms

Lato-Regular.ttf

Lato-Regular.ttf

1235 ms

alok-ind.png

alok-ind.png

1246 ms

mmrda.png

mmrda.png

1230 ms

l-and-t.jpg

l-and-t.jpg

1231 ms

eversendai.jpg

eversendai.jpg

1261 ms

reliance.jpg

reliance.jpg

1277 ms

bhel.jpg

bhel.jpg

1223 ms

zuari.jpg

zuari.jpg

1208 ms

ntpc.jpg

ntpc.jpg

794 ms

doosan.jpg

doosan.jpg

737 ms

thyssenkhrupp.jpg

thyssenkhrupp.jpg

763 ms

jindal.jpg

jindal.jpg

722 ms

chowgule.jpg

chowgule.jpg

677 ms

bg1.png

bg1.png

567 ms

bg8.png

bg8.png

641 ms

map-img.png

map-img.png

558 ms

Accessibility Review

mpil.in accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mpil.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mpil.in SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mpil.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mpil.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mpil.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MPIL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: