Tools & Wizards About Us
mrbenchmarks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

mrbenchmarks.com

Home | M+R Benchmarks 2025

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

mrbenchmarks.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mrbenchmarks.com homepage info - get ready to check Mr Benchmarks best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mrbenchmarks.com

Rejoice! M+R's annual Benchmarks Study has arrived!

Visit mrbenchmarks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mrbenchmarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mrbenchmarks.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,790 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mrbenchmarks.com

66 ms

mrbenchmarks.com

767 ms

yry5kms.css

127 ms

lottie-player.js

33 ms

app-R7gH7M7a.js

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Mrbenchmarks.com, 17% (14 requests) were made to D30s75h9mppx92.cloudfront.net and 11% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (767 ms) belongs to the original domain Mrbenchmarks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (18%)

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

4.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mrbenchmarks.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 370.3 kB

  • Original 451.9 kB
  • After minification 397.3 kB
  • After compression 81.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 54.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 370.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 546.0 kB

  • Original 5.3 MB
  • After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mr Benchmarks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 80.8 kB

  • Original 100.6 kB
  • After minification 78.9 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

  • Original 60.0 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mrbenchmarks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (16%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

57

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mr Benchmarks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mrbenchmarks.com

mrbenchmarks.com

66 ms

mrbenchmarks.com

mrbenchmarks.com

767 ms

yry5kms.css

yry5kms.css

127 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

33 ms

app-R7gH7M7a.js

app-R7gH7M7a.js

98 ms

app-pjBCL23j.css

app-pjBCL23j.css

123 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

32 ms

p.css

p.css

20 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

191 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

88 ms

Clue_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Clue_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

283 ms

Chess_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Chess_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

450 ms

Monopoly_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Monopoly_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

448 ms

Snakes-and-Ladders_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Snakes-and-Ladders_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

445 ms

Scrabble_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Scrabble_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

447 ms

Twister_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Twister_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

450 ms

fb.png

fb.png

46 ms

li.png

li.png

47 ms

logo.png

logo.png

47 ms

Jonny_Guess-Who.jpeg

Jonny_Guess-Who.jpeg

172 ms

Theresa_Guess-Who.jpeg

Theresa_Guess-Who.jpeg

172 ms

Taylor-D_Guess-Who.jpeg

Taylor-D_Guess-Who.jpeg

171 ms

Michelle_Guess-Who.jpeg

Michelle_Guess-Who.jpeg

250 ms

Lia-Mancuso-Illustration.jpeg

Lia-Mancuso-Illustration.jpeg

305 ms

Mugo_Guess-Who.jpeg

Mugo_Guess-Who.jpeg

247 ms

Sammy_Guess-Who.jpeg

Sammy_Guess-Who.jpeg

246 ms

Sarah-Vanderbilt_Guess-Who.jpeg

Sarah-Vanderbilt_Guess-Who.jpeg

246 ms

Will_Guess-Who.jpeg

Will_Guess-Who.jpeg

247 ms

Laura_Guess-Who.jpeg

Laura_Guess-Who.jpeg

306 ms

Lucy_Guess-Who.jpeg

Lucy_Guess-Who.jpeg

361 ms

Bobby-B_Guess-Who.jpeg

Bobby-B_Guess-Who.jpeg

306 ms

Tom-Giordano-Illustration.jpeg

Tom-Giordano-Illustration.jpeg

305 ms

Matt-Gordon_Guess-Who.jpeg

Matt-Gordon_Guess-Who.jpeg

305 ms

Bobby-Goldstein-Illustration.jpeg

Bobby-Goldstein-Illustration.jpeg

374 ms

Dolly-V_Guess-Who.jpg

Dolly-V_Guess-Who.jpg

367 ms

Adiyah-A_Guess-Who.jpg

Adiyah-A_Guess-Who.jpg

368 ms

Miranda-Carter-Illustration.jpeg

Miranda-Carter-Illustration.jpeg

367 ms

Sarah-C_Guess-Who.jpeg

Sarah-C_Guess-Who.jpeg

368 ms

Alex-H_Guess-Who.jpeg

Alex-H_Guess-Who.jpeg

368 ms

Amanda-J_Guess-Who.jpeg

Amanda-J_Guess-Who.jpeg

410 ms

Nehal-Mahmoud-Illustration.jpg

Nehal-Mahmoud-Illustration.jpg

411 ms

Marium_Guess-Who.jpeg

Marium_Guess-Who.jpeg

414 ms

Anne-P_Guess-Who.jpeg

Anne-P_Guess-Who.jpeg

443 ms

Eddie-G_Guess-Who.jpeg

Eddie-G_Guess-Who.jpeg

442 ms

Olivia-M_Guess-Who.jpeg

Olivia-M_Guess-Who.jpeg

412 ms

Zoe-Soriano_Guess-Who.jpeg

Zoe-Soriano_Guess-Who.jpeg

443 ms

Julia-Allenby-Illustration.jpeg

Julia-Allenby-Illustration.jpeg

448 ms

Linda-Zhang_Guess-Who.jpeg

Linda-Zhang_Guess-Who.jpeg

445 ms

Madeline_Guess-Who.jpeg

Madeline_Guess-Who.jpeg

448 ms

EEOC-Data.png

EEOC-Data.png

461 ms

Online-revenue-change-year-over-year.png

Online-revenue-change-year-over-year.png

462 ms

d

d

167 ms

d

d

31 ms

Hungry_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Hungry_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

437 ms

Trouble_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

Trouble_2024-Section-Dividers.jpg

508 ms

vue.global.js

vue.global.js

27 ms

micromodal.min.js

micromodal.min.js

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

132 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

352 ms

backbone.min.js

backbone.min.js

359 ms

d3.min.js

d3.min.js

232 ms

archive_2018.png

archive_2018.png

441 ms

archive_2019.png

archive_2019.png

457 ms

archive_2020.png

archive_2020.png

458 ms

archive_2021.png

archive_2021.png

476 ms

archive_2022.png

archive_2022.png

484 ms

archive_2023.png

archive_2023.png

487 ms

charts.js

charts.js

433 ms

vue.global.js

vue.global.js

175 ms

Nehal-Mahmoud.png

Nehal-Mahmoud.png

444 ms

Theresa-Bugeaud-Illustration.png

Theresa-Bugeaud-Illustration.png

411 ms

insight.old.min.js

insight.old.min.js

3 ms

Lia-Mancuso-Illustration.png

Lia-Mancuso-Illustration.png

410 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

314 ms

micromodal.min.js

micromodal.min.js

117 ms

d

d

400 ms

d

d

225 ms

d

d

101 ms

d

d

139 ms

d

d

151 ms

d

d

152 ms

Accessibility Review

mrbenchmarks.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mrbenchmarks.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mrbenchmarks.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mrbenchmarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mrbenchmarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mrbenchmarks.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mr Benchmarks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: