Tools & Wizards About Us
mrcleaning.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

mrcleaning.us

M.R. Cleaning Services - Top 5 Massachusetts Cleaner

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

600 ms

mrcleaning.us screenshot

About Website

Visit mrcleaning.us now to see the best up-to-date M R Cleaning content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mrcleaning.us

Are You Looking for Cleaning? Top 5 House Cleaning in MA. Reliable house cleaning professionals serving the greater Metro West area. Arlington, Marlborough, Newton, Needham, Bolton, Framingham, Sudbur...

Visit mrcleaning.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Mrcleaning.us page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mrcleaning.us performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,440 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mrcleaning.us

131 ms

mrcleaning.us

334 ms

style.min.css

108 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

161 ms

base.css

221 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Mrcleaning.us, 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (774 ms) belongs to the original domain Mrcleaning.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 285.1 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mrcleaning.us main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 939.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 254.8 kB

  • Original 299.0 kB
  • After minification 289.0 kB
  • After compression 44.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 939.0 kB
  • After minification 932.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M R Cleaning images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 552.2 kB
  • After minification 551.7 kB
  • After compression 539.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 321.8 kB
  • After minification 321.7 kB
  • After compression 311.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mrcleaning.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (78%)

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M R Cleaning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mrcleaning.us

mrcleaning.us

131 ms

mrcleaning.us

mrcleaning.us

334 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

108 ms

wp-ulike.min.css

wp-ulike.min.css

161 ms

base.css

base.css

221 ms

auxin-icon.css

auxin-icon.css

168 ms

main.css

main.css

280 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

183 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

179 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

213 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

226 ms

post-239.css

post-239.css

232 ms

elementor.css

elementor.css

235 ms

elementor-widgets.css

elementor-widgets.css

265 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

272 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

275 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

339 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

314 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

317 ms

post-521.css

post-521.css

325 ms

css

css

38 ms

custom.css

custom.css

328 ms

go-pricing.css

go-pricing.css

331 ms

post-240.css

post-240.css

347 ms

post-233.css

post-233.css

368 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

438 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

387 ms

css

css

35 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

383 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

390 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

394 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

420 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

436 ms

css

css

36 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

454 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

464 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

472 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

475 ms

js

js

60 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

489 ms

modernizr-custom.min.js

modernizr-custom.min.js

491 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

607 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

547 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

497 ms

ss-showcase.min.js

ss-showcase.min.js

490 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

479 ms

ss-carousel-single.min.js

ss-carousel-single.min.js

473 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

447 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

434 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

430 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

670 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

427 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

399 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

392 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

389 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

353 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

350 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

376 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

366 ms

pro-tools.js

pro-tools.js

366 ms

wp-ulike.min.js

wp-ulike.min.js

364 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

372 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

399 ms

custom.js

custom.js

375 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

332 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

357 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

508 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

504 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

478 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

462 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

444 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

551 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

548 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

549 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

535 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

86 ms

animate-circle.js

animate-circle.js

435 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

378 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

494 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

490 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

491 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

490 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

489 ms

Ativo-10.png

Ativo-10.png

489 ms

man-with-mop-washes-floor-office-cleaning-company-services-concept.jpg

man-with-mop-washes-floor-office-cleaning-company-services-concept.jpg

61 ms

small-arrow-down.svg

small-arrow-down.svg

491 ms

Grupo-19531-1.png

Grupo-19531-1.png

616 ms

Grupo-de-mascara-28.jpg

Grupo-de-mascara-28.jpg

630 ms

Grupo-de-mascara-29.jpg

Grupo-de-mascara-29.jpg

615 ms

1.png

1.png

613 ms

1b.png

1b.png

613 ms

2bb.jpg

2bb.jpg

611 ms

font

font

128 ms

font

font

129 ms

auxin-front.woff

auxin-front.woff

696 ms

font

font

227 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

674 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

675 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

600 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

734 ms

man-with-mop-washes-floor-office-cleaning-company-services-concept.jpg

man-with-mop-washes-floor-office-cleaning-company-services-concept.jpg

730 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

730 ms

2b.jpg

2b.jpg

731 ms

yelp_logo.svg.png

yelp_logo.svg.png

703 ms

Grupo-de-mascara-27.png

Grupo-de-mascara-27.png

703 ms

font

font

283 ms

googlemybusinesslogo.svg

googlemybusinesslogo.svg

774 ms

font

font

229 ms

font

font

270 ms

font

font

343 ms

user_60_square.png

user_60_square.png

621 ms

embed

embed

399 ms

symbols.svg

symbols.svg

290 ms

js

js

149 ms

Accessibility Review

mrcleaning.us accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mrcleaning.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

mrcleaning.us SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mrcleaning.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mrcleaning.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mrcleaning.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of M R Cleaning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: