2.1 sec in total
32 ms
1.4 sec
655 ms
Click here to check amazing MResult S content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mresults.com
MResult- Empower businesses with on-demand actionable insights with the help of data, analytics, digital and AI solutions.
Visit mresults.comWe analyzed Mresults.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
mresults.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value970 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
32 ms
122 ms
249 ms
24 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mresults.com, 88% (73 requests) were made to Mresult.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (400 ms) relates to the external source Mresult.com.
Page size can be reduced by 287.4 kB (19%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Mresults.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 744.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 286.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 286.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MResult S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 978 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 322 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mresults.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (88%)
67
8
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MResult S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mresults.com
32 ms
www.mresult.com
122 ms
mresult.com
249 ms
main.min.css
24 ms
css
32 ms
style.min.css
26 ms
wpda_public.css
29 ms
chaty-front.min.css
30 ms
sidemenu.css
31 ms
dashicons.min.css
32 ms
astra-addon-649d7e24850f18-51963105.css
43 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
33 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
40 ms
swiper.min.css
38 ms
post-6.css
43 ms
custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css
45 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
72 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
51 ms
global.css
57 ms
post-44.css
55 ms
gdpr-main.css
65 ms
css
33 ms
fontawesome.min.css
67 ms
solid.min.css
92 ms
regular.min.css
94 ms
jquery.min.js
102 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
92 ms
underscore.min.js
93 ms
backbone.min.js
168 ms
api-request.min.js
115 ms
wp-api.min.js
116 ms
wpda_rest_api.js
116 ms
custom-widget-icon-list.min.css
116 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
94 ms
fontawesome-v4-shims.css
94 ms
custom-widget-icon-box.min.css
94 ms
animations.min.css
94 ms
frontend.min.js
95 ms
lazysizes.min.js
97 ms
cht-front-script.min.js
96 ms
sidemenu.js
94 ms
astra-addon-649d7e24874f85-98756210.js
95 ms
wpmssab.min.js
99 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
106 ms
wpmss.min.js
102 ms
main.js
110 ms
uael-nav-menu.min.js
112 ms
jquery_resize.min.js
109 ms
js_cookie.min.js
109 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
106 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
111 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
119 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
119 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
111 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
107 ms
hooks.min.js
104 ms
i18n.min.js
291 ms
frontend.min.js
268 ms
waypoints.min.js
267 ms
core.min.js
266 ms
frontend.min.js
267 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
260 ms
wp-util.min.js
248 ms
frontend.min.js
246 ms
247 ms
Group-10938.png
126 ms
circle-element.png
126 ms
Rectangle-148654-8.png
127 ms
Rectangle-148655-8.png
126 ms
Myriad-Pro-Regular.ttf
336 ms
eicons.woff
336 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
400 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
352 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
311 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
378 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
131 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
162 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
184 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf
184 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
183 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
184 ms
wARDj0u
55 ms
image-5-2.png
273 ms
mresults.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
mresults.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mresults.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mresults.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mresults.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mresults.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MResult S. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: