1.7 sec in total
96 ms
1.4 sec
189 ms
Click here to check amazing M Shuttlewood content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mshuttlewood.co.uk
M Shuttlewood Ltd are proud to be an established family run business with 22 years’ experience offering national coverage.
Visit mshuttlewood.co.ukWe analyzed Mshuttlewood.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
mshuttlewood.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value460 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
96 ms
83 ms
20 ms
25 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Mshuttlewood.co.uk, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (933 ms) belongs to the original domain Mshuttlewood.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 926.1 kB (43%)
2.1 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Mshuttlewood.co.uk main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 789.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M Shuttlewood images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 365.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 365.1 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 503.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mshuttlewood.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 503.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (83%)
81
14
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Shuttlewood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mshuttlewood.co.uk
96 ms
addthis_widget.js
83 ms
style.min.css
20 ms
woo-projects.css
25 ms
woo-projects-handheld.css
24 ms
frontend.min.css
34 ms
flatpickr.min.css
30 ms
select2.min.css
38 ms
icomoon.css
25 ms
cache.skin.css
42 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
37 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
32 ms
owl.carousel.css
39 ms
owl.theme.css
75 ms
css
124 ms
font-awesome.css
70 ms
bootstrap.min.css
61 ms
elegant-style.css
71 ms
themify-icons.css
58 ms
magnific-popup.css
54 ms
style.css
73 ms
theme1.css
76 ms
default.css
67 ms
js_composer.min.css
101 ms
jquery.min.js
101 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
72 ms
flatpickr.min.js
99 ms
select2.min.js
99 ms
frontend.js
100 ms
owl.carousel.js
120 ms
formreset.min.css
122 ms
formsmain.min.css
121 ms
readyclass.min.css
122 ms
browsers.min.css
122 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
122 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
123 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
125 ms
dom-ready.min.js
123 ms
css
128 ms
rs6.css
123 ms
hooks.min.js
345 ms
i18n.min.js
342 ms
a11y.min.js
108 ms
jquery.json.min.js
102 ms
gravityforms.min.js
103 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
95 ms
rbtools.min.js
96 ms
rs6.min.js
95 ms
frontend.min.js
95 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
95 ms
bootstrap.min.js
338 ms
api.js
72 ms
jquery.cookie.js
327 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
66 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
64 ms
superfish.min.js
63 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
322 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
62 ms
app.css
61 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
320 ms
jquery.onepagenav.js
275 ms
plugins.js
276 ms
theme.js
273 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
274 ms
utils.min.js
257 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
558 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
254 ms
css
18 ms
css
27 ms
gtm.js
143 ms
logo.svg
114 ms
dummy.png
473 ms
icon-asbestos.svg
128 ms
fleet.png
792 ms
chaslogo2.png
515 ms
constructionline2.png
473 ms
safe-contractor.jpg
474 ms
iso_14001_white.png
884 ms
ISO_9001_white_Stationery.png
892 ms
opener-active.png
745 ms
facebook.svg
473 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
42 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
59 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
65 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
65 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
65 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
933 ms
impact-media.svg
407 ms
recaptcha__vi.js
62 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
14 ms
mshuttlewood.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
mshuttlewood.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mshuttlewood.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mshuttlewood.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mshuttlewood.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mshuttlewood.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M Shuttlewood. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: