7.3 sec in total
79 ms
3.2 sec
4 sec
Visit mslk.com now to see the best up-to-date Mslk content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mslk.com
MSLK brands beauty with Style + Substance®. We are a 360° agency that guides companies at all stages of development.
Visit mslk.comWe analyzed Mslk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
mslk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value2,430 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.354
31/100
15%
Value21.4 s
1/100
10%
79 ms
144 ms
127 ms
99 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Mslk.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 371.2 kB (5%)
7.1 MB
6.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Mslk.com main page is 7.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 291.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mslk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (49%)
90
46
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mslk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mslk.com
79 ms
mslk.com
144 ms
gtm.js
127 ms
style.css
99 ms
style.min.css
183 ms
unslider.css
184 ms
widgets.css
167 ms
nextgen_basic_thumbnails.css
165 ms
ngg_basic_slideshow.css
464 ms
wp-dtree.min.css
214 ms
jquery.min.js
222 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
202 ms
wp-dtree.min.js
225 ms
js
112 ms
formreset.min.css
208 ms
formsmain.min.css
235 ms
readyclass.min.css
218 ms
browsers.min.css
224 ms
basic.min.css
444 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
445 ms
theme.min.css
446 ms
plugins.js
447 ms
general.js
448 ms
new-tab.js
449 ms
wp-embed.min.js
447 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
449 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
471 ms
dom-ready.min.js
472 ms
hooks.min.js
474 ms
i18n.min.js
468 ms
a11y.min.js
475 ms
jquery.json.min.js
477 ms
gravityforms.min.js
474 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
475 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
477 ms
prefixed-style.css
410 ms
js
51 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
230 ms
beauty-branding-agency-1.jpg
174 ms
beauty-branding-agency-6.jpg
190 ms
beauty-branding-agency-2.jpg
158 ms
Beauty-branding-agency-4.jpg
181 ms
beauty-branding-3.jpg
174 ms
beauty-branding-agency-award-winning-allure.png
266 ms
beauty-branding-agency-award-winning-webby.png
261 ms
beauty-branding-agency-award-winning-rebrand100.png
258 ms
beauty-branding-agency-award-winning-allure-80x80.png
255 ms
beauty-branding-agency-award-winning-webby-137x80.png
253 ms
beauty-branding-agency-award-winning-rebrand100-80x80.png
256 ms
Logo-Grids-Desktop-1.png
302 ms
ask-men-grooming-awards-bw.png
264 ms
aiga.png
263 ms
communicator-awards-1-300x300.png
310 ms
gdusa-200x200-1.jpg
319 ms
brand-strategy-icon.png
321 ms
brand-identity-icon.png
304 ms
Packaging-2.png
304 ms
Digital-Websites.png
373 ms
Social-Media-e1526332232190.png
362 ms
Sales-And-Launch-Support-e1526332248219.png
374 ms
Awards-Stats-05-300x40.png
399 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Consumer-Recall.png
377 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Brand-Audit.png
424 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Target-Audience.png
398 ms
product-assortment.png
423 ms
beauty-branding-in-naming-and-logo.png
499 ms
brand-packaging.png
504 ms
brand-digital-marketing.png
504 ms
tag.js
1254 ms
all.js
152 ms
bg_div.png
477 ms
logo.png
475 ms
bg_div@2.png
476 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Amazing-Lash-Studio-800x394.png
846 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Amazing-Lash-Studio-1600x787.png
871 ms
Avalon-Book-webfont.woff
587 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Amazing-Lash-Studio.png
739 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Save-Me-From-800x354.png
704 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Save-Me-From-1600x709.png
735 ms
Beauty-Branding-Agency-MSLK-Save-Me-From.png
706 ms
ico_social_more.png
797 ms
all.js
43 ms
Avalon-Bold-webfont.woff
752 ms
Avalon-Medium-webfont.woff
769 ms
147 ms
app.js
608 ms
analytics.js
289 ms
collect
206 ms
featured-strategies-for-accessible-beauty-november-2019-global-cosmetics-industry-magazine-01-470x340.png
153 ms
7-Result-Driven-Secrets-to-Build-a-Conversion-Centric-Product-Page-02-470x340.png
134 ms
Blog-Post-3-02-1-470x340.png
134 ms
Awards-Stats-05-1500x200.png
132 ms
collect
78 ms
advert.gif
568 ms
angle-down-solid.svg
74 ms
Avalon-Demi-webfont.woff
196 ms
gform-icons-theme.ttf
60 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
118 ms
mslk.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
mslk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mslk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mslk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mslk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mslk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mslk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: