Tools & Wizards About Us
mt.com.sa screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

mt.com.sa

مهد التقنة للخدمات التقنية الحديثة - والاتصالات

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

667 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

200 ms

mt.com.sa screenshot

About Website

Visit mt.com.sa now to see the best up-to-date Mt content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mt.com.sa

نقدم خدمات تقنية حديثة مثل المنتجات الصوتية والاجهزة والمقويات وكروت الشحن وخدمات المواقع وغيرها الكثير من الخدمات كل ماعليك التواصل معنا في حال اردت اي خدمة وسنكون سعداء في خدمتك

Visit mt.com.sa

Key Findings

We analyzed Mt.com.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 667 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mt.com.sa performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.553

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mt.com.sa

667 ms

app.css

67 ms

apple.css

91 ms

sallaicons.css

113 ms

Ss6HjLRsIKqhYrILh2OtOf633msIrWnHr28ZDh4J.png

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Mt.com.sa, 28% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.assets.salla.network and 22% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.salla.network. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (667 ms) belongs to the original domain Mt.com.sa.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

126.1 kB

After Optimization

99.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mt.com.sa main page is 126.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 81.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 32.6 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 81.4 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 418 B

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 7.6 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mt.com.sa has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (50%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mt.com.sa

mt.com.sa

667 ms

app.css

app.css

67 ms

apple.css

apple.css

91 ms

sallaicons.css

sallaicons.css

113 ms

Ss6HjLRsIKqhYrILh2OtOf633msIrWnHr28ZDh4J.png

Ss6HjLRsIKqhYrILh2OtOf633msIrWnHr28ZDh4J.png

90 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

20 ms

app.js

app.js

92 ms

home.js

home.js

131 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

29 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

87 ms

s-empty-wide.png

s-empty-wide.png

130 ms

s-empty.png

s-empty.png

129 ms

y4F3BK6Hly4v4dSCf8p6luh16BF2JyVjrFGef7Rs.png

y4F3BK6Hly4v4dSCf8p6luh16BF2JyVjrFGef7Rs.png

130 ms

twilight.js

twilight.js

43 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

206 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

67 ms

sallaicons.ttf

sallaicons.ttf

47 ms

main.js

main.js

25 ms

Accessibility Review

mt.com.sa accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mt.com.sa best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

mt.com.sa SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    AR

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mt.com.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mt.com.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mt.com.sa

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: