11.3 sec in total
2.7 sec
8.1 sec
542 ms
Visit mtr.im now to see the best up-to-date Mtr content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mtr.im
When it comes to glass damage, prevention is a hundred times better than a cure. Omniguard has been designed to be the most versatile and convenient glass protection product on the market. And with th...
Visit mtr.imWe analyzed Mtr.im page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
mtr.im performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value5,340 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.177
68/100
15%
Value20.5 s
2/100
10%
2685 ms
434 ms
561 ms
322 ms
339 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Mtr.im, 25% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Mtr.im.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (63%)
2.6 MB
957.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Mtr.im main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 538 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mtr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 312.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 312.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mtr.im needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (79%)
63
13
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mtr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mtr.im
2685 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
434 ms
style.min.css
561 ms
styles.css
322 ms
form-basic.css
339 ms
amination.css
446 ms
style.css
535 ms
js_composer.min.css
1091 ms
font-awesome.min.css
566 ms
font-awesome-animation.min.css
518 ms
bootstrap.min.css
775 ms
flaticon.css
627 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
637 ms
owl.theme.min.css
647 ms
owl.transitions.css
672 ms
prettyPhoto.css
729 ms
perfect-scrollbar.min.css
740 ms
style.min.css
1114 ms
vc-customize.min.css
779 ms
ladda-themeless.min.css
836 ms
css
56 ms
jquery.min.js
1067 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
877 ms
spin.min.js
896 ms
ladda.min.js
939 ms
modernizr.js
986 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
1004 ms
ajax-action.min.js
1044 ms
admin-ajax.php
2587 ms
js
80 ms
css
20 ms
rs6.css
896 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
864 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
865 ms
index.js
865 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
855 ms
rbtools.min.js
1142 ms
rs6.min.js
1165 ms
bootstrap.min.js
964 ms
plugin.min.js
1076 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
994 ms
app.min.js
1072 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1046 ms
forms.js
1095 ms
app.min.js
1019 ms
analytics.js
69 ms
hevadex-logo-mob.png
456 ms
hevadex-logo.png
455 ms
dummy.png
455 ms
about.jpg
456 ms
hevadex-logo-white.png
454 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
430 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
431 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
431 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
432 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
428 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
428 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
431 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
431 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
525 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
525 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
525 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
524 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
522 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
524 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
526 ms
uset97034dw
522 ms
bg-process.jpg
931 ms
3-compressor.jpg
930 ms
bg-footer-1.jpg
930 ms
collect
410 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
397 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf
394 ms
S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf
395 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
395 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf
395 ms
flaticon.woff
397 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
356 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
435 ms
www-player.css
124 ms
www-embed-player.js
157 ms
base.js
196 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
155 ms
ad_status.js
206 ms
RyHSygdhfD3dME44-3NNtjQCjkAA9PJK5Mnnq9vnCgY.js
114 ms
embed.js
28 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
31 ms
id
28 ms
mtr.im accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mtr.im best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mtr.im SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mtr.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mtr.im main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mtr.im
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mtr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: