7.6 sec in total
1.9 sec
5.2 sec
392 ms
Click here to check amazing Mufaddal Glass content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mufaddalglass.com
Visit mufaddalglass.comWe analyzed Mufaddalglass.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
mufaddalglass.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value26.7 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value2,290 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value26.4 s
0/100
10%
1923 ms
172 ms
243 ms
168 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Mufaddalglass.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Mufaddalglass.com.
Page size can be reduced by 720.4 kB (20%)
3.7 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Mufaddalglass.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 444.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 444.4 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mufaddal Glass images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 78.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78.1 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mufaddalglass.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.6 kB or 41% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (65%)
80
28
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mufaddal Glass. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mufaddalglass.com
1923 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
172 ms
style.min.css
243 ms
classic-themes.min.css
168 ms
amwerk.css
36 ms
content_elements.crush.css
179 ms
slick.css
208 ms
style.css
215 ms
style.min.css
230 ms
styles.css
386 ms
style.css
339 ms
css
28 ms
style.css
368 ms
joinchat.min.css
373 ms
default.min.css
384 ms
pum-site-styles.css
395 ms
jquery.min.js
504 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
514 ms
amwerk.js
527 ms
slick.min.js
541 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
541 ms
content_elements.js
549 ms
script_fe.js
675 ms
bold-timeline.js
515 ms
jquery.dd.js
673 ms
cc.main.js
684 ms
email-decode.min.js
529 ms
back_to_top.css
728 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
728 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
619 ms
hooks.min.js
786 ms
i18n.min.js
785 ms
url.min.js
798 ms
api-fetch.min.js
800 ms
index.js
800 ms
fancySelect.js
805 ms
header.misc.js
978 ms
misc.js
1014 ms
js
69 ms
amwerk.js
1014 ms
framework_misc.js
918 ms
joinchat.min.js
877 ms
core.min.js
674 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
866 ms
bt_bb_elements.js
1085 ms
bt_bb_portfolio_slider.js
1075 ms
back_to_top.js
945 ms
css
15 ms
mgdl-logo.png
597 ms
blank.gif
596 ms
ls_3.jpg
592 ms
ls_2.jpg
1072 ms
ls_7.jpg
1073 ms
ls_4.jpg
1073 ms
prod8-1.jpg
1071 ms
prod9.jpg
1071 ms
prod5-1.jpg
765 ms
prod4-1.jpg
1175 ms
prod3-1.jpg
1183 ms
prod2-1.jpg
1311 ms
cf8g-1.jpg
1073 ms
ULTRA-CLEAR-FLOAT-GLASS-New.jpg
1176 ms
LOUVER-GLASS-4.jpg
1184 ms
prod1.jpg
1204 ms
partner3.png
1342 ms
partner2.png
1416 ms
partner4.png
1417 ms
font
136 ms
font
167 ms
Construction.woff
1415 ms
aLxa5Hd-Onk
137 ms
FontAwesome.woff
1284 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1411 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1505 ms
Amwerk.woff
1645 ms
FontAwesome5Solid.woff
1698 ms
FontAwesome5Regular.woff
1550 ms
FontAwesome5Brands.woff
1600 ms
www-player.css
56 ms
www-embed-player.js
119 ms
base.js
145 ms
FontAwesome5Brands.woff
1487 ms
ufg.jpg
1486 ms
img-blue-corner-top-right.png
1487 ms
ad_status.js
190 ms
odCoDBU9oV91s5dR-LaYbLEhfvL19F60bn5h6Uq-Zz0.js
368 ms
embed.js
19 ms
id
25 ms
Create
416 ms
GenerateIT
113 ms
print.css
158 ms
Curved-Glass-Building.jpg
500 ms
mufaddalglass.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mufaddalglass.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mufaddalglass.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mufaddalglass.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mufaddalglass.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mufaddalglass.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mufaddal Glass. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: