Tools & Wizards About Us
muleservices.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

muleservices.com

Muleservices - Private Underground Locating, Utility Locating

Page Load Speed

607 ms in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

458 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

muleservices.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to muleservices.com homepage info - get ready to check Muleservices best content right away, or after learning these important things about muleservices.com

MULEServices provides private underground utilities locating service to businesses, governments, and residential customers throughout the Southwest.

Visit muleservices.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Muleservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 583 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

muleservices.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.muleservices.com

24 ms

site.css

8 ms

duel.js

10 ms

addthis_widget.js

33 ms

jq.js

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Muleservices.com, 44% (20 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 38% (17 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (145 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 315.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

4.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Muleservices.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 40.9 kB

  • Original 52.7 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Muleservices images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 205.2 kB

  • Original 304.7 kB
  • After minification 304.4 kB
  • After compression 99.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.2 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 66.0 kB

  • Original 84.1 kB
  • After minification 84.1 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Muleservices.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (46%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Muleservices. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.muleservices.com

www.muleservices.com

24 ms

site.css

site.css

8 ms

duel.js

duel.js

10 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

33 ms

jq.js

jq.js

48 ms

5904d2e6e424bbd023f3d4a11fbb8abd

5904d2e6e424bbd023f3d4a11fbb8abd

17 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

145 ms

media.gallery.js

media.gallery.js

38 ms

facebookSDKHelper.js

facebookSDKHelper.js

134 ms

cookiemanager.js

cookiemanager.js

36 ms

iebackground.js

iebackground.js

37 ms

4f6afef560127725bd9bc7f2595e9040

4f6afef560127725bd9bc7f2595e9040

10 ms

30b5191a408ef20ea46772e91e05652f

30b5191a408ef20ea46772e91e05652f

18 ms

0e1d1e24957636d41855a172f93fbebe

0e1d1e24957636d41855a172f93fbebe

134 ms

3e524b8dc16b1d1d2a44efc1d6881e59

3e524b8dc16b1d1d2a44efc1d6881e59

17 ms

505300f086a8ce3f150ba3a157ddb4e2

505300f086a8ce3f150ba3a157ddb4e2

18 ms

29f890534f10186772ec32686c9478c2

29f890534f10186772ec32686c9478c2

17 ms

4c59641935de71be6d0c58cae3411987

4c59641935de71be6d0c58cae3411987

26 ms

81126726c8dc4afa119db78ba5a06c91

81126726c8dc4afa119db78ba5a06c91

27 ms

5c481a39decd091db75bbf140eb21e50

5c481a39decd091db75bbf140eb21e50

27 ms

be204de300a393ce12f45701903e3e91

be204de300a393ce12f45701903e3e91

26 ms

8ec3c3adbf2e6ea24aa12cfabe1e6fc3

8ec3c3adbf2e6ea24aa12cfabe1e6fc3

25 ms

451232a24421d16646b4f6b6ffab131e

451232a24421d16646b4f6b6ffab131e

29 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

49 ms

util.instances.js

util.instances.js

100 ms

util.model.js

util.model.js

100 ms

documentHelper.js

documentHelper.js

124 ms

util.window.js

util.window.js

98 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

53 ms

QGYpz_kZZAGCONcK2A4bGOj8mNhL.woff

QGYpz_kZZAGCONcK2A4bGOj8mNhL.woff

22 ms

util.fbSDKLoader.js

util.fbSDKLoader.js

50 ms

e09092ef1a57046ef66fad2466fc4e42

e09092ef1a57046ef66fad2466fc4e42

54 ms

wsb-slideshow-arrows.png

wsb-slideshow-arrows.png

89 ms

helper.js

helper.js

7 ms

growl.js

growl.js

9 ms

browser.js

browser.js

4 ms

sf.core.pkg.js

sf.core.pkg.js

8 ms

app.css

app.css

9 ms

4a83f2ca7e3d480a734bd3f094ddd7c4

4a83f2ca7e3d480a734bd3f094ddd7c4

30 ms

bc5edbf0105f1910766ba934cc15e26d

bc5edbf0105f1910766ba934cc15e26d

56 ms

b243d442acb9c17a0d6c115ad731c66d

b243d442acb9c17a0d6c115ad731c66d

71 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

17 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

muleservices.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

muleservices.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

muleservices.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Muleservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Muleservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

muleservices.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Muleservices. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: