3.8 sec in total
1.6 sec
1.9 sec
223 ms
Visit multiedit.com now to see the best up-to-date Multi Edit content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about multiedit.com
Visit multiedit.comWe analyzed Multiedit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
multiedit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
1616 ms
46 ms
48 ms
56 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Multiedit.com, 89% (39 requests) were made to Multieditsoftware.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Multiedit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 732.6 kB (43%)
1.7 MB
980.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Multiedit.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 889.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Multi Edit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 212.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 212.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 408.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Multiedit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 408.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (71%)
42
12
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Multi Edit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
multiedit.com
1616 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
46 ms
bbpress.css
48 ms
cn-user.min.css
56 ms
chosen.min.css
43 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
50 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
51 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
55 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
57 ms
woocommerce.css
62 ms
frontend.css
58 ms
bootstrap.min.css
73 ms
font-awesome.min.css
58 ms
style.css
68 ms
jquery.js
85 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
82 ms
bootstrap.min.js
70 ms
main.min.js
70 ms
go_pricing_skin_purple.css
82 ms
editor.js
81 ms
picturefill.min.js
83 ms
go_pricing_scripts.js
82 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
86 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
83 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
84 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
84 ms
woocommerce.min.js
83 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
82 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
84 ms
style.css
24 ms
analytics.js
115 ms
MElogo_w_name.png
17 ms
What-is-ME-slide.png
47 ms
forums-are-back.png
65 ms
shadow_3.png
17 ms
ME2008_w_area.png
47 ms
MElite_w_area.png
66 ms
MEliteSAS_w_area.png
65 ms
mobileME2008-USB_w_area.png
53 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
63 ms
linkid.js
10 ms
collect
39 ms
collect
72 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
10 ms
multiedit.com accessibility score
multiedit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
multiedit.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Multiedit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Multiedit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
multiedit.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Multi Edit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: