2.8 sec in total
147 ms
2.3 sec
400 ms
Visit multitonpolypack.com now to see the best up-to-date Multiton Polypack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about multitonpolypack.com
Visit multitonpolypack.comWe analyzed Multitonpolypack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
multitonpolypack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
48/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value5.1 s
75/100
10%
147 ms
1198 ms
145 ms
198 ms
211 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Multitonpolypack.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Multitonpolypack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 85.6 kB (5%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Multitonpolypack.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Multiton Polypack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Multitonpolypack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (32%)
47
32
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Multiton Polypack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
multitonpolypack.com
147 ms
multitonpolypack.com
1198 ms
theme.min.css
145 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css
198 ms
font-awesome.min.css
211 ms
custom.css
203 ms
magnific-popup.css
199 ms
slick-theme.css
24 ms
slick.css
26 ms
slick.min.js
39 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
27 ms
bootstrap.min.js
864 ms
custom.js
682 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js
682 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
772 ms
slick.min.js
25 ms
logo.png
301 ms
css
26 ms
embed
95 ms
embed
291 ms
8c85f3eaff71e6aefc0b9a6993dae3d5.jpg
267 ms
103de232f2f1aca957efbbd3d9336e9f.jpg
386 ms
2de9d26a3bee08f0ab366af24968e25a.jpg
392 ms
7257578cc832f580aa411f1188b91472.jpg
266 ms
ic-vt-s.png
78 ms
ic-cf-s.png
132 ms
os-1.jpg
211 ms
os-2.jpg
202 ms
os-3.jpg
276 ms
1691601746_khushboo-logo.jpg
287 ms
1691604458_monginis.jpg
341 ms
1691604498_utsavFragrances.jpg
342 ms
1691604525_evita.jpg
348 ms
1691604593_clientsquareLogo4.jpg
355 ms
1691604620_verona.jpg
415 ms
1691604671_natraj.jpg
412 ms
1691604714_rajadhiraj-logo.jpg
424 ms
1691604756_ratan-logo.jpg
429 ms
1691604802_ss-logo.jpg
455 ms
1691604833_topland-logo.jpg
463 ms
fact-bg.jpg
486 ms
ic-vt.png
485 ms
ic-cf.png
492 ms
ic-loca.png
498 ms
ic-phone.png
525 ms
ic-email.png
532 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
32 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
41 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
48 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
58 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
59 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
514 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
517 ms
js
68 ms
js
34 ms
ajax-loader.gif
16 ms
slick.woff
3 ms
multitonpolypack.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
multitonpolypack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
multitonpolypack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Multitonpolypack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Multitonpolypack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
multitonpolypack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Multiton Polypack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: