Tools & Wizards About Us
musatechnology.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

musatechnology.com

Managed IT Services for Life Sciences | Boston | San Diego | San Francisco | musa - Managed IT Services (MSP) for Life Sciences

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

307 ms

musatechnology.com screenshot

About Website

Visit musatechnology.com now to see the best up-to-date Musa Technology content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about musatechnology.com

IT Managed Services for Life Sciences. MUSA specializes supporting life science companies from startup through commercialization.

Visit musatechnology.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Musatechnology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

musatechnology.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,540 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.305

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.musatechnology.com

48 ms

RY6xDsIwDER_qJHpxMzOxhe4iVssOQmK3UL_ntBEZbF8p3c-j3DHncpDOFABNTT24FVBfrYe9jCCz8nQm5tzie4KnLysgfQg1XYhrVChrQXgtU5S76AqWYfIjNOiwwVuGwZsqVN1cq41beKbNEc6dtfFSbPw8rQpf_75xLG-npN-AQ.css

27 ms

css

24 ms

css

77 ms

greensock.js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Musatechnology.com, 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) belongs to the original domain Musatechnology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (58%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Musatechnology.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 149.7 kB

  • Original 181.0 kB
  • After minification 180.0 kB
  • After compression 31.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 570.5 kB
  • After minification 566.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Musa Technology images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 816.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 348.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 816.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 413.4 kB

  • Original 479.2 kB
  • After minification 473.9 kB
  • After compression 65.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Musatechnology.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 413.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (53%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Musa Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.musatechnology.com

www.musatechnology.com

48 ms

RY6xDsIwDER_qJHpxMzOxhe4iVssOQmK3UL_ntBEZbF8p3c-j3DHncpDOFABNTT24FVBfrYe9jCCz8nQm5tzie4KnLysgfQg1XYhrVChrQXgtU5S76AqWYfIjNOiwwVuGwZsqVN1cq41beKbNEc6dtfFSbPw8rQpf_75xLG-npN-AQ.css

RY6xDsIwDER_qJHpxMzOxhe4iVssOQmK3UL_ntBEZbF8p3c-j3DHncpDOFABNTT24FVBfrYe9jCCz8nQm5tzie4KnLysgfQg1XYhrVChrQXgtU5S76AqWYfIjNOiwwVuGwZsqVN1cq41beKbNEc6dtfFSbPw8rQpf_75xLG-npN-AQ.css

27 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

77 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

75 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

75 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

20 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

123 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

73 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

166 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

164 ms

css

css

160 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

157 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

158 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

161 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

310 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

259 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

248 ms

ga.js

ga.js

242 ms

MUSA.png

MUSA.png

58 ms

slide_4.jpg

slide_4.jpg

57 ms

BlueShirtSlide.png

BlueShirtSlide.png

446 ms

blue_slide.jpg

blue_slide.jpg

62 ms

match-flame.png

match-flame.png

61 ms

slide_3.jpg

slide_3.jpg

58 ms

MUSA.png

MUSA.png

58 ms

Graphs.jpg

Graphs.jpg

59 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

384 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

393 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

397 ms

LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff

LKf8nhXsWg5ybwEGXk8UBQ.woff

383 ms

0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

383 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

383 ms

8c9q46CAcsp9TiRX9KLgZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

8c9q46CAcsp9TiRX9KLgZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

383 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

383 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

121 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

56 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

7 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

7 ms

livechatjs.ashx

livechatjs.ashx

133 ms

Accessibility Review

musatechnology.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

musatechnology.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

musatechnology.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Musatechnology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Musatechnology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

musatechnology.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Musa Technology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: