3.6 sec in total
524 ms
3 sec
90 ms
Click here to check amazing Musipedia content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about musipedia.org
A search engine for tunes and musical themes and a collaborative music encyclopedia. Only the melody needs to be known to search Musipedia or the Web. The melody can be played on a keyboard or whistle...
Visit musipedia.orgWe analyzed Musipedia.org page load time and found that the first response time was 524 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
musipedia.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value3,040 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
524 ms
591 ms
18 ms
519 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Musipedia.org, 3% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Pw.ibanbic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) relates to the external source Pw.ibanbic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 57.4 kB (33%)
172.7 kB
115.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Musipedia.org main page is 172.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 149.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Musipedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 31% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Musipedia.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)
27
14
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Musipedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
musipedia.org
524 ms
www.musipedia.org
591 ms
stylesheet_8a56e19245.css
18 ms
stylesheet_240b4ca893.css
519 ms
css111115.css
40 ms
meledscripts.js
73 ms
soundmanager2.js
35 ms
onload.js
555 ms
adsbygoogle.js
109 ms
mpbg4.gif
35 ms
enmplogo.gif
33 ms
mpbg3.gif
35 ms
kb.gif
513 ms
cnt.gif
34 ms
whi.gif
33 ms
tp.gif
75 ms
mainnavbg.jpg
76 ms
mainnavbg_pipe.jpg
74 ms
sub_bg.gif
560 ms
site_bg.gif
75 ms
edc72d20c7.gif
74 ms
4cf7e670ac.gif
75 ms
mh.gif
76 ms
d619568a69.gif
75 ms
9d0cc5d484.gif
76 ms
f06e091afe.gif
87 ms
a232b0f397.gif
81 ms
85e015af25.gif
83 ms
piwik.js
602 ms
musipedia.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
musipedia.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
musipedia.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Document uses plugins
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Musipedia.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Musipedia.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
musipedia.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Musipedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: