Tools & Wizards About Us
mutum.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

mutum.net

mutum.net

Page Load Speed

11.1 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

8.6 sec

Page Rendered

720 ms

mutum.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mutum content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mutum.net

C/Mayor, s/n - 04630 Garrucha (Almería)

Visit mutum.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Mutum.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mutum.net performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.245

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1834 ms

wp-forecast-default.css

165 ms

estilos.css

162 ms

styles.css

212 ms

style.css

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Mutum.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Mutum.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 709.8 kB (64%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

404.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mutum.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 605.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 58.4 kB

  • Original 74.6 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 171.3 kB
  • After minification 163.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mutum images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 430.1 kB

  • Original 605.6 kB
  • After minification 564.3 kB
  • After compression 175.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 430.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 213.8 kB

  • Original 262.6 kB
  • After minification 250.6 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mutum.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (76%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mutum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

1834 ms

wp-forecast-default.css

wp-forecast-default.css

165 ms

estilos.css

estilos.css

162 ms

styles.css

styles.css

212 ms

style.css

style.css

159 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

156 ms

style.css

style.css

318 ms

style.css

style.css

317 ms

style.css

style.css

331 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.css

wpfront-scroll-top.css

329 ms

mediaelementplayer.min.css

mediaelementplayer.min.css

369 ms

wp-mediaelement.css

wp-mediaelement.css

342 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

529 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

447 ms

style.css

style.css

419 ms

photoswipe.css

photoswipe.css

420 ms

form-basic.min.css

form-basic.min.css

432 ms

css

css

107 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

532 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

624 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

510 ms

wpf_update.js

wpf_update.js

531 ms

principal.js

principal.js

555 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

666 ms

wpcasa-currency.js

wpcasa-currency.js

628 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

654 ms

widget.js

widget.js

620 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.js

wpfront-scroll-top.js

620 ms

spin.js

spin.js

714 ms

jquery.spin.js

jquery.spin.js

713 ms

js

js

194 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

596 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

602 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

126 ms

jetpack-carousel.js

jetpack-carousel.js

744 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

838 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

751 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

807 ms

prettify.js

prettify.js

742 ms

e-201613.js

e-201613.js

128 ms

photoswipe.js

photoswipe.js

702 ms

klass.min.js

klass.min.js

866 ms

code.photoswipe.jquery-3.0.5.min.js

code.photoswipe.jquery-3.0.5.min.js

1173 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

887 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

821 ms

forms-api.min.js

forms-api.min.js

887 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

840 ms

style.css

style.css

734 ms

logo-mutum-230x752.png

logo-mutum-230x752.png

170 ms

indalo-02-e1400873917968.png

indalo-02-e1400873917968.png

515 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

90 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

507 ms

google+.png

google+.png

512 ms

delicious.png

delicious.png

512 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

504 ms

bg-main-top-wrap.png

bg-main-top-wrap.png

508 ms

bg-trans-light-50.png

bg-trans-light-50.png

513 ms

al-miraya-logo_ENG_640x109.jpg

al-miraya-logo_ENG_640x109.jpg

531 ms

bg-dots.png

bg-dots.png

517 ms

02.gif

02.gif

513 ms

wpf-NNW.png

wpf-NNW.png

517 ms

n2-300x167.jpg

n2-300x167.jpg

515 ms

bg-details-beds.png

bg-details-beds.png

517 ms

bg-details-baths.png

bg-details-baths.png

528 ms

bg-details-size.png

bg-details-size.png

530 ms

bg-details-car.png

bg-details-car.png

528 ms

u-300x167.jpg

u-300x167.jpg

527 ms

p-300x167.jpg

p-300x167.jpg

692 ms

a-300x167.jpg

a-300x167.jpg

696 ms

N-300x167.jpg

N-300x167.jpg

699 ms

c-300x167.jpg

c-300x167.jpg

698 ms

n-300x167.jpg

n-300x167.jpg

699 ms

a-casa-playa-vera-malib%C3%BA-300x167.jpg

a-casa-playa-vera-malib%C3%BA-300x167.jpg

700 ms

14.png

14.png

712 ms

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

431 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

725 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

413 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

386 ms

g.gif

g.gif

125 ms

collect

collect

110 ms

2383 ms

Accessibility Review

mutum.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

mutum.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

mutum.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mutum.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mutum.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mutum.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mutum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: