Tools & Wizards About Us
my.midmark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

my.midmark.com

Midmark Portal

Page Load Speed

327 ms in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

201 ms

Page Rendered

81 ms

my.midmark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing My Midmark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about my.midmark.com

Visit my.midmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed My.midmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 282 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

my.midmark.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

my.midmark.com

45 ms

runtime.min.js

26 ms

css

38 ms

icon

53 ms

importmap.json

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original My.midmark.com, 50% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 20% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (101 ms) belongs to the original domain My.midmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of My.midmark.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. My Midmark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 159.9 kB
  • After minification 159.9 kB
  • After compression 108.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 149.8 kB
  • After minification 149.8 kB
  • After compression 114.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. My.midmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of My Midmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

my.midmark.com

my.midmark.com

45 ms

runtime.min.js

runtime.min.js

26 ms

css

css

38 ms

icon

icon

53 ms

importmap.json

importmap.json

86 ms

importmapcollection.json

importmapcollection.json

101 ms

import-map-overrides.js

import-map-overrides.js

40 ms

system.min.js

system.min.js

41 ms

amd.min.js

amd.min.js

41 ms

named-exports.min.js

named-exports.min.js

46 ms

Accessibility Review

my.midmark.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

SEO Factors

my.midmark.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise My.midmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that My.midmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

my.midmark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of My Midmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: