6.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
5 sec
541 ms
Click here to check amazing Mybabylog content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mybabylog.com
Visit mybabylog.comWe analyzed Mybabylog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Mybabylog.com rating and web reputation
mybabylog.com performance score
1058 ms
22 ms
609 ms
265 ms
522 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Mybabylog.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Mybabylog.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 449.7 kB (19%)
2.4 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Mybabylog.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 173.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mybabylog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 128.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.2 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mybabylog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (43%)
42
24
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mybabylog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mybabylog.co.uk
1058 ms
font-awesome.min.css
22 ms
style.css
609 ms
styles.css
265 ms
jquery.js
522 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
264 ms
jquery.form.min.js
263 ms
scripts.js
269 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
287 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
365 ms
woocommerce.min.js
590 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
589 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
605 ms
bootstrap.min.js
780 ms
theme.min.js
697 ms
ecafaf96-97c0-4858-b5a6-624cbdb5a780.css
123 ms
css
58 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
260 ms
analytics.js
110 ms
bgnd.jpg
329 ms
logo-header.png
297 ms
header-icons.png
308 ms
basket-icon.png
397 ms
slider-1.jpg
829 ms
slider-2.jpg
833 ms
slider-3.jpg
903 ms
slider-4.jpg
916 ms
heartbeat-banner.png
934 ms
foothand-banner.png
920 ms
leaderboard-a.png
1350 ms
mwl-logo-big.png
1181 ms
bl-tile-pink.jpg
1422 ms
bl-tile-blue.jpg
1437 ms
steiff.jpg
1440 ms
steiff-logo-a.jpg
1281 ms
Handprint-kit-image.png
1615 ms
My-first-Heartbeat-recorder.jpg
2155 ms
widgets.js
61 ms
newsletter-acorn.png
1587 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
32 ms
42eddbd0-3b0e-4c24-ba3b-57b9859b2602.woff
50 ms
b4312891-e355-4bdc-80c9-ef3dbf7bd916.woff
86 ms
linkid.js
9 ms
a901f152-b0d8-4686-bbaa-8a5aff10781b.ttf
36 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
63 ms
124dc47b-32a0-4543-a60e-d8aad32782b4.ttf
46 ms
5fac8357-5dba-4c53-80c1-607abd0eae0e.svg
41 ms
001e534b-3742-45b3-b20b-d4c53c41a519.svg
51 ms
www.mybabylog.co.uk
1902 ms
mybabylog.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mybabylog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Mybabylog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mybabylog.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mybabylog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: