Tools & Wizards About Us
mychoicenotchance.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

mychoicenotchance.com

Health insurance plans | UnitedHealthcare

Page Load Speed

886 ms in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

790 ms

Page Rendered

54 ms

mychoicenotchance.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mychoicenotchance.com now to see the best up-to-date Mychoicenotchance content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mychoicenotchance.com

Explore health insurance options including Medicare, Medicaid, individual and family, short term and dental, as well as employer plans.

Visit mychoicenotchance.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mychoicenotchance.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 844 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mychoicenotchance.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,240 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value40.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mychoicenotchance.com

42 ms

www.mychoicenotchance.com

225 ms

www.uhc.com

71 ms

clientlib-initial.min.2540186ce71f51a4008d15ae1e985a94.js

13 ms

clientlib-polyfills.min.ad433cd178db87f623dd0b9f6b153469.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Mychoicenotchance.com, 76% (28 requests) were made to Uhc.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Abyss-cloud.uhc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (254 ms) relates to the external source Instant.page.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 507.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mychoicenotchance.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 71.3 kB

  • Original 88.3 kB
  • After minification 83.6 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 795.7 kB
  • After minification 794.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mychoicenotchance images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 433.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 618.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 433.3 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 21.2 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mychoicenotchance.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (63%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mychoicenotchance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mychoicenotchance.com

mychoicenotchance.com

42 ms

www.mychoicenotchance.com

www.mychoicenotchance.com

225 ms

www.uhc.com

www.uhc.com

71 ms

clientlib-initial.min.2540186ce71f51a4008d15ae1e985a94.js

clientlib-initial.min.2540186ce71f51a4008d15ae1e985a94.js

13 ms

clientlib-polyfills.min.ad433cd178db87f623dd0b9f6b153469.js

clientlib-polyfills.min.ad433cd178db87f623dd0b9f6b153469.js

67 ms

clientlib-initial.min.e30fbd79b4c95b39f491fc9fc9f9a516.css

clientlib-initial.min.e30fbd79b4c95b39f491fc9fc9f9a516.css

83 ms

clientlib-site.min.9a92734fc69ee848a1a6b4a438937495.css

clientlib-site.min.9a92734fc69ee848a1a6b4a438937495.css

92 ms

clientlib-livechat.min.143a6046d1e2182e6a51006e0afd6baf.css

clientlib-livechat.min.143a6046d1e2182e6a51006e0afd6baf.css

116 ms

clientlib-react-components.min.3b561713c91e4bbc742eb387d322a914.css

clientlib-react-components.min.3b561713c91e4bbc742eb387d322a914.css

120 ms

launch-5e90c3319557.min.js

launch-5e90c3319557.min.js

165 ms

header.css

header.css

115 ms

uhc-header-component.parcel.js

uhc-header-component.parcel.js

147 ms

footer.css

footer.css

140 ms

uhc-footer-component.parcel.js

uhc-footer-component.parcel.js

158 ms

clientlib-video.min.7c2dd2a095161595e606ca4ac21cc226.js

clientlib-video.min.7c2dd2a095161595e606ca4ac21cc226.js

141 ms

clientlib-site.min.c030be6310791a765dd68eb627959d3f.js

clientlib-site.min.c030be6310791a765dd68eb627959d3f.js

158 ms

5.1.0

5.1.0

254 ms

clientlib-react-components.min.aa6e1fd37bdd258534077849cab682f8.js

clientlib-react-components.min.aa6e1fd37bdd258534077849cab682f8.js

230 ms

clientlib-livechat.min.97c708380f6c61c536c9dfcf828a40f0.js

clientlib-livechat.min.97c708380f6c61c536c9dfcf828a40f0.js

157 ms

original

original

100 ms

cq5dam.web.1280.1280.jpeg

cq5dam.web.1280.1280.jpeg

99 ms

AppMeasurement.min.js

AppMeasurement.min.js

65 ms

CTA_internal_digitalblue.svg

CTA_internal_digitalblue.svg

54 ms

caret_down_darkgrey.svg

caret_down_darkgrey.svg

91 ms

brightcove_neutral.svg

brightcove_neutral.svg

9 ms

caret_down_digitalblue.svg

caret_down_digitalblue.svg

7 ms

original

original

92 ms

UHCSans-Medium.woff

UHCSans-Medium.woff

114 ms

UHCSans-SemiBold.woff

UHCSans-SemiBold.woff

116 ms

UHCSans-Bold.woff

UHCSans-Bold.woff

134 ms

UHCSerif-SemiBold.woff

UHCSerif-SemiBold.woff

133 ms

UHCSerifHeadlineWeb-Bold.woff

UHCSerifHeadlineWeb-Bold.woff

90 ms

UHCSerifHeadlineWeb-Regular.woff

UHCSerifHeadlineWeb-Regular.woff

93 ms

UHCSerifHeadlineWeb-Light.woff

UHCSerifHeadlineWeb-Light.woff

91 ms

UHCSansDigital-Bold.woff

UHCSansDigital-Bold.woff

91 ms

UHCSansDigital-SemiBold.woff

UHCSansDigital-SemiBold.woff

93 ms

UHCSansDigital-Medium.woff

UHCSansDigital-Medium.woff

93 ms

Accessibility Review

mychoicenotchance.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

mychoicenotchance.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

mychoicenotchance.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mychoicenotchance.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mychoicenotchance.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mychoicenotchance.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mychoicenotchance. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: