Access mymaster-24.ru. Строители Нижнего Новгорода и области

Report Summary

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mymaster 24 content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mymaster-24.ru

Бригады монолитчиков, каменщиков, отделочников, сантехников и электриков в Нижнем Новгороде. Прорабы, ИТР, архитекторы и проектировщики Нижнего Новгорода

Visit mymaster-24.ru

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

mymaster-24.ru

667 ms

jquery.min.js

223 ms

global_styles.css

318 ms

slick.css

320 ms

lp9.css

693 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Mymaster-24.ru, 2% (1 request) were made to Yandex.ru and 2% (1 request) were made to Informer.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Yandex.ru.

Content Size

412.0 kB

After Optimization

274.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Mymaster-24.ru main page is 412.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 188.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 54.8 kB

Original 66.0 kB
After minification 63.4 kB
After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

Original 15.8 kB
After minification 14.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mymaster 24 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

Original 188.3 kB
After minification 188.3 kB
After compression 152.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 45.3 kB

Original 141.9 kB
After minification 141.9 kB
After compression 96.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mymaster-24.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mymaster 24. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

RU
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mymaster-24.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mymaster-24.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mymaster-24.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mymaster 24. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Строители Нижнего Новгорода и области

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)