23.9 sec in total
634 ms
22.3 sec
929 ms
Click here to check amazing My Query content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about myquery.co.uk
Ask Questions and get FREE answers on #MyQuery. Best QA sites in UK. Find Categories, topics, companies to review and complain online.
Visit myquery.co.ukWe analyzed Myquery.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 634 ms and then it took 23.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
myquery.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value13.7 s
2/100
10%
Value2,100 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
634 ms
4017 ms
15378 ms
608 ms
431 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Myquery.co.uk, 12% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Myquery.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 120.2 kB (76%)
157.7 kB
37.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Myquery.co.uk main page is 157.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 151.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. My Query images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (95%)
78
4
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of My Query. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
myquery.co.uk
634 ms
myquery.co.uk
4017 ms
fonts.css
15378 ms
main.css
608 ms
overrides.css
431 ms
style.min.css
424 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
552 ms
wc-all-blocks-style.css
394 ms
styles.css
409 ms
woocommerce.css
433 ms
job-listings.css
821 ms
all.min.css
828 ms
smart-menu.css
440 ms
bootstrap.min.css
454 ms
bootstrap-overwrites.css
479 ms
featherlight.css
494 ms
job_manager.css
499 ms
style.css
515 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
3907 ms
swiper.min.css
1062 ms
post-9999.css
4091 ms
post-77.css
4248 ms
leaflet.css
1227 ms
openstreet.css
1444 ms
public-main.css
2031 ms
select2.css
1973 ms
ez-media-uploader.css
2505 ms
slick.css
2430 ms
sweetalert.css
2820 ms
fep.css
2909 ms
style.css
3022 ms
woocommerce.css
3442 ms
css
43 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
3035 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
3046 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
3056 ms
hooks.min.js
3069 ms
w.js
25 ms
jquery.min.js
3082 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
49 ms
style.css
3132 ms
font-awesome.min.css
3318 ms
flip_box.css
3485 ms
heading.css
3684 ms
related.css
3862 ms
slick.css
3486 ms
animations.min.css
3492 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
3476 ms
core.min.js
3854 ms
menu.min.js
3618 ms
dom-ready.min.js
3996 ms
i18n.min.js
3604 ms
a11y.min.js
3585 ms
autocomplete.min.js
3536 ms
autocomplete.js
3332 ms
shape-divider.js
3334 ms
jquery.form.min.js
3111 ms
underscore.min.js
2957 ms
backbone.min.js
2749 ms
selectize.min.js
2232 ms
common.js
2170 ms
list.js
1793 ms
tags.js
1727 ms
index.js
1929 ms
index.js
1729 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1657 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1318 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1317 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1317 ms
smush-lazy-load-native.min.js
1315 ms
popper.min.js
1315 ms
bootstrap.min.js
968 ms
smart-menu.js
933 ms
egemenerd-grid.js
718 ms
featherlight.js
559 ms
custom.js
557 ms
slick.min.js
556 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
559 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
561 ms
waypoints.min.js
807 ms
frontend.min.js
404 ms
g.gif
131 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
169 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
177 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
295 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
401 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
434 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
435 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
434 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
68 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
69 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
344 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
343 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
347 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
345 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
344 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
345 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1072 ms
Logo-MQ-1.png
757 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
2369 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
783 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1722 ms
myquery.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
myquery.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
myquery.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Myquery.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Myquery.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
myquery.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of My Query. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: