Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

myricettarium.com

My Ricettarium

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

271 ms

myricettarium.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing My Ricettarium content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about myricettarium.com

Blog di ricette semplici

Visit myricettarium.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Myricettarium.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

myricettarium.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,580 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.122

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

myricettarium.com

33 ms

www.myricettarium.com

750 ms

webfont.js

52 ms

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

102 ms

authorization.css

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 418 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Myricettarium.com, 10% (41 requests) were made to 1.bp.blogspot.com and 9% (39 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) relates to the external source Dovevoandareinterapia.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 396.9 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Myricettarium.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 976.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 206.4 kB

  • Original 253.9 kB
  • After minification 253.1 kB
  • After compression 47.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 45.2 kB

  • Original 976.0 kB
  • After minification 930.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. My Ricettarium images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 78.9 kB

  • Original 290.5 kB
  • After minification 288.1 kB
  • After compression 211.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 66.3 kB

  • Original 93.7 kB
  • After minification 93.1 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Myricettarium.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 102 (26%)

Requests Now

400

After Optimization

298

The browser has sent 400 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of My Ricettarium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

myricettarium.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

myricettarium.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

myricettarium.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Myricettarium.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Myricettarium.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of My Ricettarium. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: