Tools & Wizards About Us
myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com

Myrtle Beach Seaside Resorts

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

210 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

454 ms

myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Myrtle Beach Seaside Resorts content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com

With six stunning oceanfront resorts, see why guests continue to choose Myrtle Beach Seaside Resorts for their beach vacation needs.

Visit myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 210 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.31

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com

210 ms

styles.min.css

95 ms

content.min.css

107 ms

jquery.min.js

29 ms

js.aspx

461 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com, 30% (13 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 18% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (461 ms) relates to the external source Twi.revinate.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 89.7 kB

  • Original 124.0 kB
  • After minification 123.9 kB
  • After compression 34.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Myrtle Beach Seaside Resorts images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 38.5 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 30.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 102.2 kB
  • After minification 102.2 kB
  • After compression 71.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (51%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Myrtle Beach Seaside Resorts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com

www.myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com

210 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

95 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

107 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

29 ms

js.aspx

js.aspx

461 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

33 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

38 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

44 ms

webfontloader.js

webfontloader.js

45 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

18 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

21 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

21 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

27 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

31 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

33 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

31 ms

jquery.lazy.iframe.min.js

jquery.lazy.iframe.min.js

32 ms

global.min.js

global.min.js

112 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

30 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

myrtle-beach-seaside-resorts-logo.png

myrtle-beach-seaside-resorts-logo.png

30 ms

1x1.png

1x1.png

28 ms

Avista%203.png

Avista%203.png

103 ms

grandeshores.jpg

grandeshores.jpg

121 ms

horizon.jpg

horizon.jpg

87 ms

prince.jpg

prince.jpg

171 ms

seaside.jpg

seaside.jpg

108 ms

towers.jpg

towers.jpg

186 ms

PingPongTable.png

PingPongTable.png

113 ms

internet.png

internet.png

128 ms

ResortPool.png

ResortPool.png

134 ms

PrivatePool.png

PrivatePool.png

138 ms

Beachfront.png

Beachfront.png

145 ms

BoardGames.png

BoardGames.png

152 ms

GolfBall.png

GolfBall.png

159 ms

css

css

44 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

24 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

44 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

53 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff

52 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

53 ms

6xKhdSpbNNCT-sWPCmjbLnwI.woff

6xKhdSpbNNCT-sWPCmjbLnwI.woff

89 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

52 ms

Accessibility Review

myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

myrtlebeachseasideresorts.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Myrtle Beach Seaside Resorts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: