2.6 sec in total
252 ms
2 sec
273 ms
Visit myxgeva.com now to see the best up-to-date Myxgeva content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about myxgeva.com
Learn more about XGEVA® (denosumab) and its approved use in appropriate patients.
Visit myxgeva.comWe analyzed Myxgeva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
myxgeva.com performance score
252 ms
337 ms
391 ms
351 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Myxgeva.com, 61% (36 requests) were made to Xgeva.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (634 ms) relates to the external source Xgeva.com.
Page size can be reduced by 465.0 kB (40%)
1.2 MB
697.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Myxgeva.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 650.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Myxgeva images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 336.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 336.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Myxgeva.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (37%)
49
31
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Myxgeva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
myxgeva.com
252 ms
www.myxgeva.com
337 ms
www.xgeva.com
391 ms
main.css
351 ms
bhz4khx.js
55 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
213 ms
iscroll.js
376 ms
jwplayer.js
512 ms
jquery.session.js
144 ms
jquery.simplemodal.js
298 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
295 ms
scripts.js
297 ms
webtrends.load.js
297 ms
tracking.js
296 ms
floodlight_tags.js
373 ms
webtrends_tags.js
376 ms
activityi;src=3889351;type=tier3446;cat=Xgeva0;ord=5913455791305.751
100 ms
xgeva-logo.png
150 ms
utility-linkbtn-bg.jpg
149 ms
global-elements.png
219 ms
gradient-bg.jpg
219 ms
top-nav-bg.jpg
218 ms
print-banner.png
634 ms
home-slide-1.jpg
356 ms
home-slide-2.jpg
370 ms
home-slide-3.jpg
327 ms
home-slide-4.jpg
327 ms
icon-list.png
354 ms
red-btn-bg.jpg
369 ms
white-arrow.png
370 ms
print-xgeva-action.png
489 ms
print-xgeva-program.png
423 ms
xgeva-in-action-bg.jpg
426 ms
white-btn-bg.jpg
429 ms
arrow-btn.jpg
429 ms
gradient-gray.jpg
493 ms
sticky-isi-bg.png
495 ms
back-top-arrow.png
496 ms
amgen-logo.jpg
495 ms
www.xgeva.com
56 ms
p.gif
83 ms
roitrack.cgi
65 ms
1452889162
147 ms
1-zp5zm2hgMP.js
413 ms
1849349452
146 ms
UVxmjU41cMbs0S1vPSQ3vK9OC7-F21mcpS1YVp_tfKIffFAwgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mw.woff
189 ms
bWvon6igGSzoB1YWTq-CpT57X0DQ2x5a1ysONzkBN-JffFpwgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
189 ms
LseJm-js9RVv3aPnqsNHqQWXlLHGsjB3kwSNSsQ0jdIffF0wgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
246 ms
lC_5vKXmHdIux1qYsXsX8QU4GIsuW3s267rh7oBhS1qffV0fgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
215 ms
yR4wcXMuXWrKs5r2y45m3npbnvFmCnB9mNyzenSnOdwffVkfgsMmeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
188 ms
roitrack.cgi
19 ms
roitrack.cgi
48 ms
webtrends.min.js
269 ms
gtm.js
32 ms
activityi;src=3900926;type=count557;cat=Xgeva---;ord=1;num=8541100294585;~oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xgeva.com%2F
33 ms
webtrends.hm.js
73 ms
webtrends.fb.js
78 ms
webtrends.yt.js
80 ms
wtid.js
48 ms
myxgeva.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Myxgeva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Myxgeva.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
myxgeva.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Myxgeva. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: