Tools & Wizards About Us
r.mail.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

r.mail.ru

Рекламная платформа myTarget — Сервис таргетированной рекламы

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

381 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

105 ms

r.mail.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to r.mail.ru homepage info - get ready to check R Mail best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about r.mail.ru

Платформа myTarget для самостоятельного размещения рекламы в соцсетях ВКонтакте, Одноклассники и на других проектах VK. Узнайте подробности на сайте.

Visit r.mail.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed R.mail.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 381 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

r.mail.ru performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value50.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,780 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.168

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value51.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

r.mail.ru

381 ms

target.my.com

701 ms

animate.css

131 ms

vendors.8d1992884ca17bdab368.css

260 ms

styles.73d13d0efc104395f10e.css

1137 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original R.mail.ru, 70% (21 requests) were made to Target.my.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Top-fwz1.mail.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Target.my.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of R.mail.ru main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 6.3 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 59% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 128.7 kB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 5.2 MB
  • After compression 5.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 784.5 kB
  • After minification 784.5 kB
  • After compression 736.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R.mail.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (76%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Mail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

r.mail.ru

r.mail.ru

381 ms

target.my.com

target.my.com

701 ms

animate.css

animate.css

131 ms

vendors.8d1992884ca17bdab368.css

vendors.8d1992884ca17bdab368.css

260 ms

styles.73d13d0efc104395f10e.css

styles.73d13d0efc104395f10e.css

1137 ms

service-page.css

service-page.css

517 ms

ads.js

ads.js

518 ms

rbadman-html5.min.js

rbadman-html5.min.js

800 ms

runtime.ad3babe82c4ffd994ae9.js

runtime.ad3babe82c4ffd994ae9.js

521 ms

styles.e55766ee92770221b702.js

styles.e55766ee92770221b702.js

917 ms

react.575369006078821a2317.js

react.575369006078821a2317.js

2244 ms

vendors.48a842063bb7c6c02ff0.js

vendors.48a842063bb7c6c02ff0.js

2238 ms

app.637338da0efae8b6995b.js

app.637338da0efae8b6995b.js

1291 ms

ui.de324c40a9a871c7d922.js

ui.de324c40a9a871c7d922.js

1271 ms

statistics.6587751d2a57f3dbc697.js

statistics.6587751d2a57f3dbc697.js

1272 ms

trg.b658757b04041ab74b3b.js

trg.b658757b04041ab74b3b.js

1294 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

code.js

code.js

1331 ms

cm.gif

cm.gif

134 ms

3125365a2c4453b61239.woff

3125365a2c4453b61239.woff

144 ms

c8ca85fde98a3d22fcac.woff

c8ca85fde98a3d22fcac.woff

163 ms

17e5610c017c538c7d98.woff

17e5610c017c538c7d98.woff

154 ms

92a4468f47ab72d4e6cb.woff

92a4468f47ab72d4e6cb.woff

151 ms

c85089e5633d909bdcf2.woff

c85089e5633d909bdcf2.woff

282 ms

491c693b5b1039116f86.woff

491c693b5b1039116f86.woff

957 ms

d664ee2b33a0d66f8a05.woff

d664ee2b33a0d66f8a05.woff

283 ms

counter2

counter2

141 ms

sync-loader.js

sync-loader.js

781 ms

dyn-goal-config.js

dyn-goal-config.js

130 ms

counter

counter

157 ms

Accessibility Review

r.mail.ru accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

r.mail.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

r.mail.ru SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R.mail.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that R.mail.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

r.mail.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R Mail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: