Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

testing.meteoblue.com

Weather West Houston Medical Center Heliport - meteoblue

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

testing.meteoblue.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to testing.meteoblue.com homepage info - get ready to check Testing Meteoblue best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about testing.meteoblue.com

Today's and tonight's professional weather forecast for West Houston Medical Center Heliport. Precipitation radar, HD satellite images, and current weather warnings, hourly temperature, chance of rain...

Visit testing.meteoblue.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Testing.meteoblue.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

testing.meteoblue.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

testing.meteoblue.com

222 ms

west-houston-medical-center-heliport_united-states_4740908

562 ms

main.css

106 ms

homepage.css

202 ms

main.js

477 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Testing.meteoblue.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Mb-richtexteditor.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (853 ms) belongs to the original domain Testing.meteoblue.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.1 kB (66%)

Content Size

193.2 kB

After Optimization

65.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Testing.meteoblue.com main page is 193.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 144.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 128.1 kB

  • Original 144.7 kB
  • After minification 92.0 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 52.7 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Testing Meteoblue images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testing.meteoblue.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (24%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testing Meteoblue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

testing.meteoblue.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

testing.meteoblue.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

testing.meteoblue.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testing.meteoblue.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testing.meteoblue.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Testing Meteoblue. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: