Tools & Wizards About Us
try.mudblazor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

try.mudblazor.com

TryMudBlazor - A playground for testing MudBlazor components in the browser

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

353 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

try.mudblazor.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Try Mud Blazor content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about try.mudblazor.com

TryMudBlazor is a fiddle-like platform for writing, compiling, executing and sharing Blazor components entirely in the browser. Perfect for code playground and testing.

Visit try.mudblazor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Try.mudblazor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

try.mudblazor.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value64.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,780 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

try.mudblazor.com

353 ms

css

33 ms

css

45 ms

css

48 ms

MudBlazor.min.css

262 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Try.mudblazor.com, 25% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (463 ms) belongs to the original domain Try.mudblazor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 46.6 kB (31%)

Content Size

151.3 kB

After Optimization

104.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Try.mudblazor.com main page is 151.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 90.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 56.5 kB
  • After minification 56.5 kB
  • After compression 44.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 90.2 kB
  • After minification 90.2 kB
  • After compression 58.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Try.mudblazor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (82%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Try Mud Blazor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

try.mudblazor.com

try.mudblazor.com

353 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

45 ms

css

css

48 ms

MudBlazor.min.css

MudBlazor.min.css

262 ms

TryMudBlazor.min.css

TryMudBlazor.min.css

353 ms

split.min.js

split.min.js

332 ms

loader.js

loader.js

346 ms

js

js

67 ms

blazor.webassembly.js

blazor.webassembly.js

463 ms

MudBlazor.min.js

MudBlazor.min.js

414 ms

main.js

main.js

344 ms

Accessibility Review

try.mudblazor.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

try.mudblazor.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

try.mudblazor.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Try.mudblazor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Try.mudblazor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

try.mudblazor.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Try Mud Blazor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: