4.4 sec in total
610 ms
3.6 sec
213 ms
Visit us.moor.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Us Moor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about us.moor.co.uk
The global leader in innovative products for tissue blood flow and oxygen assessments using laser Doppler and laser speckle contrast imaging
Visit us.moor.co.ukWe analyzed Us.moor.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 610 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
us.moor.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
610 ms
201 ms
197 ms
13 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Us.moor.co.uk, 11% (12 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Us.moor.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 559.7 kB (10%)
5.6 MB
5.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Us.moor.co.uk main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Us Moor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 351.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 351.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 111.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Us.moor.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (56%)
100
44
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Us Moor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
us.moor.co.uk
610 ms
screen.min.css
201 ms
threesixty.css
197 ms
font-awesome.min.css
13 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
198 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
49 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
247 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.min.js
247 ms
buttons.js
13 ms
loader.js
11 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
261 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.js
385 ms
functions.min.js
225 ms
trackingCode.js
76 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
logo.gif
212 ms
logo.png
226 ms
menu.png
227 ms
au.png
226 ms
ca.png
332 ms
cn.png
359 ms
de.png
387 ms
gb.png
409 ms
ru.png
410 ms
us.png
412 ms
pubMed.gif
520 ms
searchglass.png
540 ms
2_xl.png
1392 ms
_xl.jpg
998 ms
5_xl.png
1096 ms
19_xl.jpg
2303 ms
1_xl.png
1434 ms
4_xl.png
826 ms
nextarrow.png
1020 ms
facebook.png
1196 ms
twitter.png
1213 ms
youtube.png
1292 ms
linkedin.png
1407 ms
navDropBG.jpg
44 ms
505_m.jpg
1497 ms
508_m.png
1569 ms
545_m.png
1862 ms
525_m.png
1669 ms
footerBG.png
1605 ms
collect
32 ms
AvenirNextLTPro%20Regular.otf
1851 ms
f6ebea36-fb7c-4458-a43e-2112c48c17e4.woff
1825 ms
3a42a252-67ff-4186-88cf-762f56719ca1.woff
1865 ms
AvenirNextLTPro%20Medium.otf
2025 ms
0417e965-6ae1-4395-8f71-f61ea767d523.woff
2115 ms
AvenirNextLTPro%20Bold.otf
2221 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4 ms
plusone.js
144 ms
include.js
173 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
165 ms
51a56502-44d2-4d70-808f-fc822da45209.woff
2006 ms
logoBall.png
1908 ms
ondomload.min.js
2074 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
9 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
23 ms
fastbutton
121 ms
bx_loader.gif
2085 ms
postmessageRelay
40 ms
gateway1.whoson.com
168 ms
invite.js
169 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
23 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
29 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
6 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
18 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
16 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
34 ms
getSegment.php
258 ms
checkOAuth.esi
37 ms
hoverbuttons.6eab8de2ee93b309873157b6d3f977fe.css
6 ms
hoverbuttons.035267d71d894482eb413e5bea488ff5.js
5 ms
t.dhj
59 ms
t.dhj
40 ms
cm
46 ms
x35248
115 ms
s-3271.xgi
14 ms
hbpix
166 ms
4 ms
pixel
19 ms
xrefid.xgi
14 ms
10 ms
pixel
16 ms
2981
21 ms
index.2d85e55d89f85ae69e4f2ca5ab9438b7.html
21 ms
buttons.ab966a004186897711de4a5ed256c924.css
13 ms
stcommon.2b05accc08f1ee42fe1983647ab923ea.js
2 ms
st.1188278743c14064d5e8ae56c8ada29c.js
5 ms
poll.gif
82 ms
css3.css
101 ms
print.min.css
199 ms
ga.js
8 ms
mini_Top_Cap_R.png
7 ms
facebook_32.png
35 ms
mini_BG_R.png
6 ms
mini_Bottom_Cap_R.png
5 ms
twitter_32.png
6 ms
googleplus_32.png
33 ms
linkedin_32.png
32 ms
xing_32.png
105 ms
baidu_32.png
45 ms
email_32.png
33 ms
sharethis_32.png
32 ms
__utm.gif
8 ms
us.moor.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
us.moor.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
us.moor.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Us.moor.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Us.moor.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
us.moor.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Us Moor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: