Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

e.nanawall.com

NanaWall | Movable Glass Wall Systems | Folding & Sliding Doors

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

418 ms

Resources Loaded

606 ms

Page Rendered

72 ms

e.nanawall.com screenshot

About Website

Visit e.nanawall.com now to see the best up-to-date E Nana Wall content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e.nanawall.com

Operable glass walls for commercial and residential openings. Our interior and exterior glass door systems redefine your office, patio, or storefront.

Visit e.nanawall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed E.nanawall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 418 ms and then it took 678 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

e.nanawall.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,740 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

e.nanawall.com

418 ms

svrGP

164 ms

tinydot.gif

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original E.nanawall.com, 67% (2 requests) were made to S1745.t.eloqua.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (418 ms) belongs to the original domain E.nanawall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 271 B (35%)

Content Size

767 B

After Optimization

496 B

In fact, the total size of E.nanawall.com main page is 767 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 767 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 271 B

  • Original 767 B
  • After minification 766 B
  • After compression 496 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 271 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Nana Wall. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

e.nanawall.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

e.nanawall.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

e.nanawall.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E.nanawall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that E.nanawall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Nana Wall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: