Tools & Wizards About Us
jobs.nottinghampost.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

jobs.nottinghampost.com

Nottingham Jobs | Search Jobs in Nottingham | Fish4

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

612 ms

jobs.nottinghampost.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jobs.nottinghampost.com now to see the best up-to-date Jobs Nottingham Post content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jobs.nottinghampost.com

Search Fish4jobs to find a selection of job vacancies in Nottingham. Upload your CV now and let recruiters find you with Fish4.

Visit jobs.nottinghampost.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jobs.nottinghampost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jobs.nottinghampost.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,100 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jobs.nottinghampost.com

146 ms

9 ms

285 ms

package.css;p=master,branding;v=d46890b5c82779173ad3b9c53f0ab524

10 ms

css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jobs.nottinghampost.com, 51% (21 requests) were made to Fish4.co.uk and 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (405 ms) relates to the external source Fish4.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 219.0 kB (26%)

Content Size

838.7 kB

After Optimization

619.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jobs.nottinghampost.com main page is 838.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 627.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 108.9 kB

  • Original 125.8 kB
  • After minification 112.6 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 40.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jobs Nottingham Post needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 88.6 kB

  • Original 627.2 kB
  • After minification 627.2 kB
  • After compression 538.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jobs.nottinghampost.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (57%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jobs Nottingham Post. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jobs.nottinghampost.com

jobs.nottinghampost.com

146 ms

9 ms

285 ms

package.css;p=master,branding;v=d46890b5c82779173ad3b9c53f0ab524

package.css;p=master,branding;v=d46890b5c82779173ad3b9c53f0ab524

10 ms

css

css

42 ms

lazyad-loader.min.js;v=a9c6ba5eae065cbd08d84c8f29a9f5e5

lazyad-loader.min.js;v=a9c6ba5eae065cbd08d84c8f29a9f5e5

22 ms

load.sumome.com

load.sumome.com

122 ms

recaptcha-injector.min.js;v=109284e55c129e69ac8c14ab7ede473a

recaptcha-injector.min.js;v=109284e55c129e69ac8c14ab7ede473a

22 ms

api.js

api.js

88 ms

as.js

as.js

377 ms

jquery.min.js;v=d9c5f2837f92c99aabe5a812fa491328

jquery.min.js;v=d9c5f2837f92c99aabe5a812fa491328

68 ms

jquery-patches.min.js;v=88e2b2058e34e570bebed955b88fa246

jquery-patches.min.js;v=88e2b2058e34e570bebed955b88fa246

68 ms

dict.js;v=d9a956a2849cedeb12c6a778ff57def8

dict.js;v=d9a956a2849cedeb12c6a778ff57def8

78 ms

bundle.min.js;v=82deb180af7da25c24c36b2e3a94ea54

bundle.min.js;v=82deb180af7da25c24c36b2e3a94ea54

78 ms

package.js;p=custom;v=c1b4990aff2cab3031cb549d1c989f9f

package.js;p=custom;v=c1b4990aff2cab3031cb549d1c989f9f

89 ms

custom-recommended-jobs.js;v=a625055850623549bef8602d1d04bd9d

custom-recommended-jobs.js;v=a625055850623549bef8602d1d04bd9d

90 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

193 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

94 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

192 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

331 ms

logo.png;v=4aa56d0f8a1f904c99ac6927c20bfae0

logo.png;v=4aa56d0f8a1f904c99ac6927c20bfae0

55 ms

54 ms

footer-logo.svg;v=152f1e4eb9b384f89eec23fafa1de1dd

footer-logo.svg;v=152f1e4eb9b384f89eec23fafa1de1dd

55 ms

299 ms

font

font

144 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

144 ms

sumome.js

sumome.js

111 ms

js

js

148 ms

oswald-regular-webfont.svg

oswald-regular-webfont.svg

138 ms

mdgx-icons.woff;v=2c7498369c855ca7551645a78c5d7eb9

mdgx-icons.woff;v=2c7498369c855ca7551645a78c5d7eb9

137 ms

custom-icons.woff;v=0ec46ec30054a9ef5cb98cb383524f1d

custom-icons.woff;v=0ec46ec30054a9ef5cb98cb383524f1d

137 ms

fish4-icons.svg

fish4-icons.svg

138 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

221 ms

as.gif

as.gif

405 ms

uc.js

uc.js

390 ms

analytics-browser-gtm-wrapper-3.7.11.js.br

analytics-browser-gtm-wrapper-3.7.11.js.br

177 ms

js

js

100 ms

fish4-icons.woff

fish4-icons.woff

86 ms

collect

collect

172 ms

sync.min.js

sync.min.js

96 ms

container.html

container.html

106 ms

Accessibility Review

jobs.nottinghampost.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jobs.nottinghampost.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jobs.nottinghampost.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jobs.nottinghampost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jobs.nottinghampost.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jobs.nottinghampost.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jobs Nottingham Post. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: