Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

naaptol.com

Online Shopping India, Shop Mobile Phone, Mens & Womens Wear, Jewellery, Home Appliances at Naaptol.com

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

870 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

262 ms

naaptol.com screenshot

About Website

Visit naaptol.com now to see the best up-to-date Naaptol content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about naaptol.com

Naaptol is India's leading online store. Buy latest mobiles phone, digital cameras, bedsheets, watches, accessories, gifts, brands & hot deals products at best price. → EMI → Cash on Delivery → Easy R...

Visit naaptol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Naaptol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 870 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

naaptol.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,710 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

naaptol.com

870 ms

www.naaptol.com

1076 ms

naaptol.css

38 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

50 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack-2.1.5.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Naaptol.com, 44% (28 requests) were made to Layout.naptol.com and 22% (14 requests) were made to Images.naptol.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Bat.bing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 240.5 kB (34%)

Content Size

709.8 kB

After Optimization

469.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Naaptol.com main page is 709.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 315.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 179.5 kB

  • Original 204.9 kB
  • After minification 181.6 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 179.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 36.7 kB

  • Original 315.9 kB
  • After minification 279.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Naaptol needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 144.9 kB
  • After minification 144.3 kB
  • After compression 128.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 44.1 kB
  • After minification 44.1 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naaptol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (45%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Naaptol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

naaptol.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

naaptol.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

naaptol.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naaptol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Naaptol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Naaptol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: