6.2 sec in total
304 ms
5.4 sec
506 ms
Click here to check amazing Nabit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nabit.in
nabit allows small businesses to publish mobile offers instantly
Visit nabit.inWe analyzed Nabit.in page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Nabit.in rating and web reputation
nabit.in performance score
304 ms
182 ms
1860 ms
206 ms
363 ms
Our browser made a total of 228 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nabit.in, 92% (210 requests) were made to Nabitworks.com and 2% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Nabitworks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.6 MB (67%)
5.4 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Nabit.in main page is 5.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nabit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.2 MB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 304.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nabit.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 304.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 188 (87%)
215
27
The browser has sent 215 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nabit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 182 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nabit.in
304 ms
www.nabitworks.com
182 ms
1860 ms
normalize.css
206 ms
foundation.min.css
363 ms
style.css
370 ms
ie.css
159 ms
css
24 ms
css
72 ms
custom.modernizr.js
239 ms
WebResource.axd
316 ms
ScriptResource.axd
274 ms
ScriptResource.axd
497 ms
ScriptResource.axd
351 ms
ScriptResource.axd
366 ms
ScriptResource.axd
403 ms
ScriptResource.axd
425 ms
ScriptResource.axd
439 ms
ScriptResource.axd
444 ms
ScriptResource.axd
440 ms
ScriptResource.axd
477 ms
ScriptResource.axd
492 ms
ScriptResource.axd
526 ms
ScriptResource.axd
527 ms
ScriptResource.axd
527 ms
ScriptResource.axd
554 ms
ScriptResource.axd
558 ms
ScriptResource.axd
573 ms
ScriptResource.axd
582 ms
ScriptResource.axd
587 ms
ScriptResource.axd
590 ms
ScriptResource.axd
499 ms
ScriptResource.axd
491 ms
ScriptResource.axd
610 ms
ScriptResource.axd
523 ms
ScriptResource.axd
536 ms
ScriptResource.axd
537 ms
ScriptResource.axd
558 ms
ScriptResource.axd
578 ms
ScriptResource.axd
601 ms
ScriptResource.axd
622 ms
ScriptResource.axd
577 ms
ScriptResource.axd
546 ms
ScriptResource.axd
527 ms
flexslider.css
527 ms
ScriptResource.axd
521 ms
ScriptResource.axd
480 ms
ScriptResource.axd
465 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
en_generic_rgb_wo_45.png
100 ms
ScriptResource.axd
466 ms
ScriptResource.axd
502 ms
collect
15 ms
ScriptResource.axd
486 ms
collect
56 ms
ScriptResource.axd
479 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
ScriptResource.axd
474 ms
ScriptResource.axd
463 ms
ScriptResource.axd
483 ms
ScriptResource.axd
472 ms
ScriptResource.axd
455 ms
ScriptResource.axd
454 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
468 ms
ScriptResource.axd
490 ms
ScriptResource.axd
481 ms
ScriptResource.axd
474 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
465 ms
ScriptResource.axd
486 ms
ScriptResource.axd
486 ms
ScriptResource.axd
488 ms
ScriptResource.axd
462 ms
ScriptResource.axd
454 ms
ScriptResource.axd
457 ms
ScriptResource.axd
464 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
436 ms
ScriptResource.axd
426 ms
ScriptResource.axd
431 ms
ScriptResource.axd
461 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
ScriptResource.axd
445 ms
ScriptResource.axd
453 ms
ScriptResource.axd
462 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
482 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
451 ms
ScriptResource.axd
457 ms
ScriptResource.axd
465 ms
ScriptResource.axd
488 ms
ScriptResource.axd
435 ms
ScriptResource.axd
445 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
463 ms
ScriptResource.axd
465 ms
ScriptResource.axd
444 ms
ScriptResource.axd
438 ms
ScriptResource.axd
454 ms
ScriptResource.axd
455 ms
ScriptResource.axd
469 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
435 ms
ScriptResource.axd
455 ms
ScriptResource.axd
456 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
439 ms
ScriptResource.axd
439 ms
ScriptResource.axd
453 ms
ScriptResource.axd
454 ms
ScriptResource.axd
451 ms
ScriptResource.axd
456 ms
ScriptResource.axd
446 ms
ScriptResource.axd
444 ms
ScriptResource.axd
460 ms
ScriptResource.axd
456 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
450 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
ScriptResource.axd
452 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
431 ms
ScriptResource.axd
452 ms
ScriptResource.axd
447 ms
ScriptResource.axd
461 ms
ScriptResource.axd
457 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
ScriptResource.axd
436 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
ScriptResource.axd
440 ms
ScriptResource.axd
455 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
440 ms
ScriptResource.axd
468 ms
ScriptResource.axd
464 ms
ScriptResource.axd
454 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
461 ms
ScriptResource.axd
455 ms
ScriptResource.axd
465 ms
ScriptResource.axd
449 ms
ScriptResource.axd
445 ms
ScriptResource.axd
445 ms
ScriptResource.axd
461 ms
ScriptResource.axd
468 ms
ScriptResource.axd
460 ms
ScriptResource.axd
447 ms
ScriptResource.axd
444 ms
ScriptResource.axd
444 ms
ScriptResource.axd
458 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
ScriptResource.axd
451 ms
ScriptResource.axd
443 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
ScriptResource.axd
452 ms
ScriptResource.axd
466 ms
ScriptResource.axd
484 ms
ScriptResource.axd
437 ms
ScriptResource.axd
446 ms
ScriptResource.axd
456 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
ScriptResource.axd
460 ms
ScriptResource.axd
463 ms
ScriptResource.axd
444 ms
ScriptResource.axd
446 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
ScriptResource.axd
447 ms
ScriptResource.axd
465 ms
ScriptResource.axd
452 ms
ScriptResource.axd
442 ms
ScriptResource.axd
434 ms
ScriptResource.axd
458 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
ScriptResource.axd
442 ms
ScriptResource.axd
448 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
629 ms
foundation.min.js
484 ms
functions.js
476 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
628 ms
jquery.localscroll-1.2.7.js
444 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1.js
449 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
490 ms
custom.js
513 ms
logo3.png
463 ms
00_CategScn.png
515 ms
01_MenuScn-.png
640 ms
02_Screen%20A%201.png
750 ms
03_Screen%202%20A.png
516 ms
effectivead.png
618 ms
footfall.png
592 ms
locationaware.png
583 ms
site2.png
566 ms
rajdhani.png
565 ms
bf.png
669 ms
via.png
670 ms
oye.png
638 ms
otp.png
637 ms
dejavu.png
620 ms
nh8.png
617 ms
barleys.png
601 ms
nat.png
595 ms
gt.png
568 ms
en_generic_rgb_wo_45.png
72 ms
Lgyoe_kfDI4
113 ms
super.jpg
458 ms
handphone.png
729 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
9 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
18 ms
Ez4zJbsGr2BgXcNUWBVgEPf4jeoVDNLU0gIpvaTJHt4.ttf
33 ms
entypo.woff
452 ms
www-embed-player-vfl-z2BtK.css
20 ms
www-embed-player.js
39 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
82 ms
ad_status.js
82 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
113 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
112 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
202 ms
entypo.ttf
76 ms
entypo.svg
151 ms
nabit.in SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nabit.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Nabit.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nabit.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nabit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: