Tools & Wizards About Us
nacaferm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

nacaferm.com

Guide to the Best Mobile App Development Tools in 2023 | AppMaster

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

904 ms

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

nacaferm.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nacaferm.com now to see the best up-to-date Nacaferm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nacaferm.com

Are you looking for the best mobile app development tools in 2023? Check out the list of the best development tools here to choose the best platform.

Visit nacaferm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nacaferm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nacaferm.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

our-guide-to-the-best-mobile-app-development-tools-android-ios-in-2022

235 ms

145cedd.js

54 ms

ed7b270.js

73 ms

eebe551.js

80 ms

ee0f0bb.js

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Nacaferm.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (569 ms) relates to the external source Appmaster.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 366.1 kB (75%)

Content Size

487.1 kB

After Optimization

121.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Nacaferm.com main page is 487.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 446.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 366.1 kB

  • Original 446.5 kB
  • After minification 440.5 kB
  • After compression 80.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 366.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 40.6 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nacaferm images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (57%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nacaferm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

our-guide-to-the-best-mobile-app-development-tools-android-ios-in-2022

our-guide-to-the-best-mobile-app-development-tools-android-ios-in-2022

235 ms

145cedd.js

145cedd.js

54 ms

ed7b270.js

ed7b270.js

73 ms

eebe551.js

eebe551.js

80 ms

ee0f0bb.js

ee0f0bb.js

78 ms

a6512ae.js

a6512ae.js

75 ms

019cae2.js

019cae2.js

78 ms

3935252.js

3935252.js

90 ms

d7a7cdc.js

d7a7cdc.js

75 ms

04c5534.js

04c5534.js

88 ms

ca31d53.js

ca31d53.js

218 ms

24076c4.js

24076c4.js

216 ms

1fd973f.js

1fd973f.js

216 ms

7c86bb1.js

7c86bb1.js

224 ms

3ac0b93.js

3ac0b93.js

220 ms

4e65854.js

4e65854.js

219 ms

b48a3db.js

b48a3db.js

221 ms

aa03654.js

aa03654.js

221 ms

8cb65fc.js

8cb65fc.js

241 ms

ff6a6a1.js

ff6a6a1.js

239 ms

42e6624.js

42e6624.js

238 ms

b738747.js

b738747.js

249 ms

566e4a1.js

566e4a1.js

250 ms

e34de54.js

e34de54.js

249 ms

dcd41e7.js

dcd41e7.js

255 ms

963cc3a.js

963cc3a.js

266 ms

9e8ee83.js

9e8ee83.js

262 ms

49d5b06.js

49d5b06.js

263 ms

0d1a26d.js

0d1a26d.js

262 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

logo_full.2779212.svg

269 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

271 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

header-course.3aaea7e.png

277 ms

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

278 ms

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

281 ms

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

282 ms

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

286 ms

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

266 ms

check-icon.svg

check-icon.svg

248 ms

569 ms

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

225 ms

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

227 ms

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

230 ms

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

227 ms

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

238 ms

medal-performer-fall.56aca05.svg

medal-performer-fall.56aca05.svg

229 ms

medal-asia-pacific.0d9649d.svg

medal-asia-pacific.0d9649d.svg

232 ms

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

108 ms

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

117 ms

Accessibility Review

nacaferm.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

nacaferm.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nacaferm.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nacaferm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nacaferm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nacaferm.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nacaferm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: