Tools & Wizards About Us
nafomen.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

nafomen.com

久久99精品久久久久久久,成年视频夜公开,欧美欧美人夜视频影院_欧美污夜网站_亚洲欧美日本另类3344_在线精品欧美制服丝袜_四色永久网址夜欧美_撕开奶罩揉吮奶头视频

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

416 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

nafomen.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nafomen.com homepage info - get ready to check Nafomen best content right away, or after learning these important things about nafomen.com

久久99精品久久久久久久,成年视频夜公开,欧美欧美人夜视频影院_欧美污夜网站_亚洲欧美日本另类3344_在线精品欧美制服丝袜_欧美一夜特欧美大片色视频_A全欧美三夜30分钟,成年字幕在线播放五月天,欧美老头老太HD,天天摸夜夜艹,欧美夜人成电影夜网站,三夜午夜成年成年,黑人尾随入室强制中出电影在线

Visit nafomen.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nafomen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 416 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nafomen.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.166

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

416 ms

push.js

1485 ms

tj.js

66 ms

common.js

132 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Nafomen.com, 11% (1 request) were made to Push.zhanzhang.baidu.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Sdk.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Push.zhanzhang.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 882 B (31%)

Content Size

2.8 kB

After Optimization

2.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Nafomen.com main page is 2.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 595 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 760 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 595 B or 44% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 287 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 287 B or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (60%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

2

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nafomen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

index.php

416 ms

push.js

push.js

1485 ms

tj.js

tj.js

66 ms

common.js

common.js

132 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

js-sdk-pro.min.js

78 ms

collect

collect

811 ms

djo999.html

djo999.html

430 ms

hm.js

hm.js

100 ms

mmzyw001.com

mmzyw001.com

736 ms

Accessibility Review

nafomen.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

nafomen.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

nafomen.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nafomen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Nafomen.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

nafomen.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nafomen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: