Tools & Wizards About Us
najada.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

najada.com

Diving in Croatia with Najada in Murter and Kornati National Park

Page Load Speed

13.5 sec in total

First Response

320 ms

Resources Loaded

12.6 sec

Page Rendered

605 ms

najada.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Najada content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about najada.com

Diving in Croatia with Najada. We offer the finest, coral-covered steep walls, fascinating wrecks and an impressive biotope.

Visit najada.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Najada.com page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 13.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

najada.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

najada.com

320 ms

1755 ms

ccaf38d17e3e2f1a45e0b02f595191f5.js

444 ms

25d8b21bcd1ae78b4ded6aa1322d8c76.js

413 ms

animate.min.css

306 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Najada.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Najada.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (38%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Najada.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 69.5 kB

  • Original 93.3 kB
  • After minification 89.6 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Najada needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 213.1 kB
  • After minification 213.1 kB
  • After compression 199.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 50.9 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Najada.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (66%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Najada. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

najada.com

najada.com

320 ms

1755 ms

ccaf38d17e3e2f1a45e0b02f595191f5.js

ccaf38d17e3e2f1a45e0b02f595191f5.js

444 ms

25d8b21bcd1ae78b4ded6aa1322d8c76.js

25d8b21bcd1ae78b4ded6aa1322d8c76.js

413 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

306 ms

star_rating.css

star_rating.css

337 ms

recent_widget.css

recent_widget.css

339 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

338 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

wp-video-lightbox.css

617 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

619 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

624 ms

gp-bttp.css

gp-bttp.css

638 ms

image-map-pro.min.css

image-map-pro.min.css

640 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

713 ms

style.css

style.css

925 ms

style.css

style.css

932 ms

yellow.css

yellow.css

931 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

945 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1059 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1022 ms

ajaxify-stars.js

ajaxify-stars.js

1225 ms

ajaxify-likes.js

ajaxify-likes.js

1233 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

1246 ms

video-lightbox.js

video-lightbox.js

1247 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

1334 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1375 ms

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

1536 ms

front.js

front.js

1539 ms

tinynav.min.js

tinynav.min.js

1545 ms

ai.min.js

ai.min.js

1560 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1634 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

1695 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

1835 ms

28492ad9605b31f46d67ab50365df96b.js

28492ad9605b31f46d67ab50365df96b.js

1941 ms

gp-bttp.js

gp-bttp.js

1859 ms

image-map-pro.min.js

image-map-pro.min.js

1973 ms

jquery.rwdImageMaps.min.js

jquery.rwdImageMaps.min.js

1946 ms

general.js

general.js

2007 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1812 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1835 ms

font.css

font.css

1608 ms

css

css

32 ms

jelena4.jpg

jelena4.jpg

671 ms

stpeter.jpg

stpeter.jpg

539 ms

school1.jpg

school1.jpg

647 ms

basis3.jpg

basis3.jpg

727 ms

above1.jpg

above1.jpg

830 ms

pi_anna_kitchen.png

pi_anna_kitchen.png

852 ms

pi_preisliste.png

pi_preisliste.png

1336 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

948 ms

gplus.png

gplus.png

970 ms

logo_100best.png

logo_100best.png

1027 ms

logo_tauchparadies_transp.png

logo_tauchparadies_transp.png

1249 ms

logo_tauchernet.png

logo_tauchernet.png

1268 ms

logo_kornat.png

logo_kornat.png

1362 ms

Zertifikat.jpg

Zertifikat.jpg

1488 ms

nobile-webfont.woff

nobile-webfont.woff

1386 ms

TitilliumText22L003-webfont.woff

TitilliumText22L003-webfont.woff

1626 ms

TitilliumText22L004-webfont.woff

TitilliumText22L004-webfont.woff

1642 ms

Chunkfive-webfont.woff

Chunkfive-webfont.woff

1595 ms

fancybox-x.png

fancybox-x.png

1595 ms

fancybox.png

fancybox.png

1773 ms

fancybox-y.png

fancybox-y.png

1721 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

1886 ms

Accessibility Review

najada.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

najada.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

najada.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Najada.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Najada.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

najada.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Najada. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: