Tools & Wizards About Us
nalmco.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

nalmco.org

Home

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

nalmco.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nalmco.org homepage info - get ready to check Nalmco best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about nalmco.org

Visit nalmco.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Nalmco.org page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nalmco.org performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.143

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nalmco.org

61 ms

www.nalmco.org

92 ms

www.nalmco.org

975 ms

css

36 ms

jquery.min.js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Nalmco.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Nalmco.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 176.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nalmco.org main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 68.7 kB

  • Original 97.3 kB
  • After minification 94.9 kB
  • After compression 28.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nalmco images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 95.6 kB

  • Original 293.0 kB
  • After minification 291.0 kB
  • After compression 197.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 95.6 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 29.7 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nalmco.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (71%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nalmco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nalmco.org

nalmco.org

61 ms

www.nalmco.org

www.nalmco.org

92 ms

www.nalmco.org

www.nalmco.org

975 ms

css

css

36 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

87 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

77 ms

jquery-ui-custom-elvn-fr.min.js

jquery-ui-custom-elvn-fr.min.js

126 ms

jQueryUIDialogInclude.js

jQueryUIDialogInclude.js

82 ms

jquery.dataTables.js

jquery.dataTables.js

100 ms

jquery.tablednd-0.5.js

jquery.tablednd-0.5.js

81 ms

json2.js

json2.js

121 ms

underscore.js

underscore.js

150 ms

ui.all.css

ui.all.css

152 ms

jqueryui.css

jqueryui.css

119 ms

system-messages.css

system-messages.css

152 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

174 ms

joomla.javascript.js

joomla.javascript.js

161 ms

caption.js

caption.js

204 ms

ajax_1.3.js

ajax_1.3.js

153 ms

modal.css

modal.css

161 ms

modal.js

modal.js

220 ms

general.css

general.css

201 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

191 ms

mc01.css

mc01.css

197 ms

mc02.css

mc02.css

223 ms

editor.css

editor.css

227 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

230 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

226 ms

crawler.js

crawler.js

235 ms

crawler.js

crawler.js

1022 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

225 ms

mc-respond-v2.1.js

mc-respond-v2.1.js

263 ms

ui.base.css

ui.base.css

110 ms

ui.theme.css

ui.theme.css

161 ms

ui.core.css

ui.core.css

26 ms

ui.resizable.css

ui.resizable.css

98 ms

ui.accordion.css

ui.accordion.css

45 ms

ui.dialog.css

ui.dialog.css

42 ms

ui.slider.css

ui.slider.css

54 ms

ui.tabs.css

ui.tabs.css

68 ms

ui.datepicker.css

ui.datepicker.css

99 ms

ui.progressbar.css

ui.progressbar.css

101 ms

logo.png

logo.png

64 ms

alt-logo.png

alt-logo.png

57 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

61 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

174 ms

slide-4.jpg

slide-4.jpg

77 ms

slide-5.jpg

slide-5.jpg

82 ms

slide-6.jpg

slide-6.jpg

176 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

106 ms

fc-2.jpg

fc-2.jpg

163 ms

fc-6.jpg

fc-6.jpg

239 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

48 ms

sn-facebook.svg

sn-facebook.svg

68 ms

sn-linkedin.svg

sn-linkedin.svg

105 ms

www.nalmco.org

www.nalmco.org

422 ms

Accessibility Review

nalmco.org accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nalmco.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

nalmco.org SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nalmco.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nalmco.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nalmco.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nalmco. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: