Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 69

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

namecatch.com

Google

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

755 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

namecatch.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to namecatch.com homepage info - get ready to check Namecatch best content for Indonesia right away, or after learning these important things about namecatch.com

Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.

Visit namecatch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Namecatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 929 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

namecatch.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

namecatch.com

113 ms

www.namecatch.com

257 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.7.custom.css

103 ms

style.css

112 ms

jquery-1.4.4.min.js

179 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Namecatch.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (257 ms) belongs to the original domain Namecatch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 234.1 kB (70%)

Content Size

336.2 kB

After Optimization

102.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Namecatch.com main page is 336.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 246.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 24.1 kB
  • After minification 21.1 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 923 B

  • Original 10.1 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Namecatch images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 166.2 kB

  • Original 246.1 kB
  • After minification 230.4 kB
  • After compression 79.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 47.6 kB

  • Original 55.8 kB
  • After minification 41.3 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Namecatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Namecatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

namecatch.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

namecatch.com best practices score

69

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

namecatch.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Namecatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Namecatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Namecatch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: