Tools & Wizards About Us
namedu.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

namedu.org

Best UGC/CSIR/ Net jrf Online Coaching in Delhi

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

597 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

70 ms

namedu.org screenshot

About Website

Visit namedu.org now to see the best up-to-date Namedu content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about namedu.org

Visit namedu.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Namedu.org page load time and found that the first response time was 597 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

namedu.org performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

namedu.org

597 ms

www.namedu.org

1439 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

780 ms

swiper.min.css

764 ms

post-7.css

577 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Namedu.org, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Namedu.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (81%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

329.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Namedu.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 998.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 34.9 kB
  • After minification 33.8 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 527.5 kB

  • Original 709.6 kB
  • After minification 694.4 kB
  • After compression 182.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 527.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 859.0 kB

  • Original 998.1 kB
  • After minification 979.4 kB
  • After compression 139.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Namedu.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 859.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (94%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Namedu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

namedu.org

namedu.org

597 ms

www.namedu.org

www.namedu.org

1439 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

780 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

764 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

577 ms

global.css

global.css

594 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

593 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1181 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

770 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1575 ms

text-animations.min.css

text-animations.min.css

791 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1715 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1152 ms

css

css

257 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

975 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

988 ms

particles.js

particles.js

1172 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

1186 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

1347 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1369 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

1378 ms

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

1384 ms

drop-down-search.min.js

drop-down-search.min.js

1540 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

1566 ms

ow-lightbox.min.js

ow-lightbox.min.js

1580 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

1789 ms

ow-slider.min.js

ow-slider.min.js

1787 ms

scroll-effect.min.js

scroll-effect.min.js

1787 ms

scroll-top.min.js

scroll-top.min.js

1787 ms

select.min.js

select.min.js

1788 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1903 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

2114 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1956 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1965 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1967 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2366 ms

modal-popups.min.js

modal-popups.min.js

2092 ms

Accessibility Review

namedu.org accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

namedu.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

namedu.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Namedu.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Namedu.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

namedu.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Namedu. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: