Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

namehog.net

Welcome to All Daily Customers | Tsohost

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

namehog.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to namehog.net homepage info - get ready to check Namehog best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about namehog.net

We're delighted to announce that Daily has joined the Tsohost family. Login to your account, contact support and more.

Visit namehog.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Namehog.net page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

namehog.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

namehog.net

291 ms

www.namehog.net

385 ms

style.css

87 ms

top_site_navigation.css

171 ms

tabcontent_home.css

172 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Namehog.net, 6% (3 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Namehog.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 498.9 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Namehog.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 43.8 kB
  • After minification 29.4 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 434.3 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Namehog needs image optimization as it can save up to 434.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 27.3 kB
  • After compression 20.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 27.4 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Namehog.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (29%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Namehog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

namehog.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    US-ASCII

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Namehog.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Namehog.net main page’s claimed encoding is us-ascii. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Namehog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: