3.3 sec in total
432 ms
2.6 sec
279 ms
Welcome to nameplan.com homepage info - get ready to check Nameplan best content right away, or after learning these important things about nameplan.com
Providing authentic marketing services for small business with a focus on local audiences. Small business stories deserve to be heard.
Visit nameplan.comWe analyzed Nameplan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 432 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
nameplan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
432 ms
227 ms
242 ms
211 ms
237 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Nameplan.com, 30% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Nameplan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 187.5 kB (16%)
1.1 MB
961.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Nameplan.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 654.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nameplan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nameplan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (90%)
42
4
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nameplan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nameplan.com
432 ms
main.min.css
227 ms
wp-show-posts-min.css
242 ms
astra-addon-64f0dc7ef07300-89924078.css
211 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
237 ms
frontend.min.css
202 ms
swiper.min.css
241 ms
post-2124.css
390 ms
frontend.min.css
395 ms
all.min.css
412 ms
v4-shims.min.css
466 ms
post-2252.css
473 ms
style.css
532 ms
css
34 ms
fontawesome.min.css
611 ms
brands.min.css
623 ms
v4-shims.min.js
640 ms
email-decode.min.js
467 ms
flatpickr.min.css
712 ms
frontend.min.js
682 ms
astra-addon-64f0dc7ef0bb81-30626616.js
720 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
797 ms
jquery.min.js
844 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
869 ms
flatpickr.min.js
900 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
936 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
966 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1034 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1071 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1058 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1125 ms
hooks.min.js
1117 ms
i18n.min.js
1151 ms
frontend.min.js
1220 ms
waypoints.min.js
1288 ms
core.min.js
1302 ms
frontend.min.js
1301 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1348 ms
underscore.min.js
1172 ms
wp-util.min.js
1201 ms
frontend.min.js
1253 ms
2019_logo_black-and-red-250x66.png
877 ms
header1.jpg
841 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8JoA.woff
43 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8JoA.woff
43 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8JoA.woff
53 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8JoA.woff
52 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8JoA.woff
53 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8JoA.woff
51 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8JoA.woff
52 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8JoA.woff
53 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8JoA.woff
56 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
54 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
67 ms
L0xhDFMnlVwD4h3Lt9JWnbX3jG-2X5XHE1ofFQ.woff
67 ms
L0xhDFMnlVwD4h3Lt9JWnbX3jG-2X6zHE1ofFQ.woff
67 ms
L0xhDFMnlVwD4h3Lt9JWnbX3jG-2X0DAE1ofFQ.woff
67 ms
L0xhDFMnlVwD4h3Lt9JWnbX3jG-2X3LAE1ofFQ.woff
66 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1080 ms
nameplan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
nameplan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
nameplan.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nameplan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nameplan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nameplan.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nameplan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: