Tools & Wizards About Us
nano2.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

nano2.com

Nano2.com – My WordPress Blog

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

344 ms

nano2.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nano2.com homepage info - get ready to check Nano2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about nano2.com

NanO2 offers an innovative alternative to current aeration technology utilizing high velocity engineered nozzles to create clouds of micro nano-bubbles in solution. Delivering supersaturated oxygen an...

Visit nano2.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nano2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nano2.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.386

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nano2.com

1008 ms

nano2.com

1532 ms

css

31 ms

nano2.com

2114 ms

nano2.com

1867 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Nano2.com, 26% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Nano2.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 163.0 kB (20%)

Content Size

799.6 kB

After Optimization

636.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Nano2.com main page is 799.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 655.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 116.0 kB

  • Original 139.5 kB
  • After minification 139.5 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 47.1 kB

  • Original 655.2 kB
  • After minification 608.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nano2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nano2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nano2.com

nano2.com

1008 ms

nano2.com

nano2.com

1532 ms

css

css

31 ms

nano2.com

nano2.com

2114 ms

nano2.com

nano2.com

1867 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

168 ms

js

js

75 ms

nano2.com

nano2.com

1755 ms

nano2.com

nano2.com

2251 ms

Nano2.png

Nano2.png

116 ms

Sewer-pipe-graphic.png

Sewer-pipe-graphic.png

326 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEww.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEww.woff

157 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKw.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKw.woff

172 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rl.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rl.woff

176 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rl.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rl.woff

189 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rl.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rl.woff

187 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

155 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

200 ms

Slider_water2j.png

Slider_water2j.png

267 ms

Accessibility Review

nano2.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nano2.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

nano2.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nano2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nano2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nano2.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nano2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: