Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

nanohub.org

nanoHUB.org - Simulation, Education, and Community for Nanotechnology

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

290 ms

Resources Loaded

659 ms

Page Rendered

53 ms

nanohub.org screenshot

About Website

Visit nanohub.org now to see the best up-to-date NanoHUB content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nanohub.org

nanoHUB.org is designed to be a resource to the entire nanotechnology discovery and learning community.

Visit nanohub.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Nanohub.org page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 712 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nanohub.org performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nanohub.org

290 ms

360 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Nanohub.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (360 ms) belongs to the original domain Nanohub.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.9 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

839.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Nanohub.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 702.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 218 B
  • After minification 216 B
  • After compression 168 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50 B or 23% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

  • Original 702.6 kB
  • After minification 664.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NanoHUB images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 282.3 kB

  • Original 419.5 kB
  • After minification 414.1 kB
  • After compression 137.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 282.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 162.3 kB

  • Original 199.5 kB
  • After minification 167.7 kB
  • After compression 37.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanohub.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

nanohub.org accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

nanohub.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

nanohub.org SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanohub.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nanohub.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NanoHUB. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: