Tools & Wizards About Us
nanokar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

nanokar.com

NANOKAR – Geleceğin Malzemeleri

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

381 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

243 ms

nanokar.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nanokar.com homepage info - get ready to check NANOKAR best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about nanokar.com

Visit nanokar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nanokar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 381 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nanokar.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nanokar.com

381 ms

nanokar.com

1252 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

378 ms

style.min.css

263 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

387 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Nanokar.com, 22% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Nanokar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 629.5 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nanokar.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 909.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 451.1 kB

  • Original 488.3 kB
  • After minification 482.5 kB
  • After compression 37.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 451.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 158.0 kB

  • Original 909.6 kB
  • After minification 751.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, NANOKAR needs image optimization as it can save up to 158.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 109.2 kB
  • After minification 109.2 kB
  • After compression 101.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 189.3 kB
  • After minification 189.3 kB
  • After compression 176.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanokar.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NANOKAR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nanokar.com

nanokar.com

381 ms

nanokar.com

nanokar.com

1252 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

378 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

263 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

387 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

554 ms

content_elements.crush.css

content_elements.crush.css

511 ms

slick.css

slick.css

404 ms

style.css

style.css

404 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

410 ms

styles.css

styles.css

552 ms

cresta-whatsapp-chat-front-css.min.css

cresta-whatsapp-chat-front-css.min.css

559 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

560 ms

style.css

style.css

689 ms

css

css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

519 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

654 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

542 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

549 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

923 ms

content_elements.js

content_elements.js

642 ms

bold-timeline.js

bold-timeline.js

669 ms

jquery.dd.js

jquery.dd.js

677 ms

cc.main.js

cc.main.js

842 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

761 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

777 ms

index.js

index.js

793 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

805 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

884 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

908 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

1073 ms

fancySelect.js

fancySelect.js

1073 ms

header.misc.js

header.misc.js

1073 ms

misc.js

misc.js

1073 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1074 ms

bt_bb_elements.js

bt_bb_elements.js

1074 ms

nanokar_materials_logo_final.png

nanokar_materials_logo_final.png

565 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

359 ms

anti-arrow-gray-right.png

anti-arrow-gray-right.png

360 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

259 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

259 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

462 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff

462 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

466 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff

465 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff

463 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff

465 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff

463 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff

463 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff

465 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff

466 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff

466 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff

467 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff

467 ms

Chemistry.woff

Chemistry.woff

459 ms

FontAwesome5Solid.woff

FontAwesome5Solid.woff

459 ms

FontAwesome.woff

FontAwesome.woff

460 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

528 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

460 ms

nanokar-grafen-removebg-preview.png

nanokar-grafen-removebg-preview.png

453 ms

nanografen-nanokar-removebg-preview.png

nanografen-nanokar-removebg-preview.png

574 ms

grafen-removebg-preview.png

grafen-removebg-preview.png

1070 ms

grafen-nanokar-removebg-preview.png

grafen-nanokar-removebg-preview.png

473 ms

nanotekcnology.png

nanotekcnology.png

832 ms

background_03_home2.png

background_03_home2.png

397 ms

nanokar.com

nanokar.com

971 ms

print.css

print.css

133 ms

Accessibility Review

nanokar.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

nanokar.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nanokar.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanokar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nanokar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nanokar.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NANOKAR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: