Tools & Wizards About Us
nanolokedgerecall.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

nanolokedgerecall.com

3M™ DBI-SALA® Twin-Leg Nano-Lok™ edge and Twin-Leg Nano-Lok™ Wrap Back Self-Retracting Lifelines Stop Use and Product Recall

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

83 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

126 ms

nanolokedgerecall.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nanolokedgerecall.com now to see the best up-to-date Nano Lok Edge Recall content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nanolokedgerecall.com

3M™ DBI-SALA® Twin-Leg Nano-Lok™ edge and Twin-Leg Nano-Lok™ Wrap Back Self-Retracting Lifelines Stop Use and Product Recall

Visit nanolokedgerecall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nanolokedgerecall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nanolokedgerecall.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.09

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.nanolokedgerecall.com

83 ms

bootstrap.css

22 ms

StyleSheet.css

41 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

34 ms

jquery-3.5.1.js

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Nanolokedgerecall.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Nanolokedgerecall.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 302.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

908.7 kB

After Optimization

606.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nanolokedgerecall.com main page is 908.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 455.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 50% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 233.1 kB

  • Original 455.9 kB
  • After minification 222.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nano Lok Edge Recall needs image optimization as it can save up to 233.1 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 42.2 kB

  • Original 382.5 kB
  • After minification 382.5 kB
  • After compression 340.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

  • Original 47.5 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanolokedgerecall.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (55%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nano Lok Edge Recall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.nanolokedgerecall.com

www.nanolokedgerecall.com

83 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

22 ms

StyleSheet.css

StyleSheet.css

41 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

34 ms

jquery-3.5.1.js

jquery-3.5.1.js

152 ms

JScript.js

JScript.js

60 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

102 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

66 ms

api.js

api.js

51 ms

js

js

74 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

42 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

184 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

248 ms

ai.0.js

ai.0.js

164 ms

3M-Logo.jpg

3M-Logo.jpg

147 ms

RecallImage1.png

RecallImage1.png

153 ms

RecallImage2.png

RecallImage2.png

155 ms

RecallImage3.png

RecallImage3.png

157 ms

RecallImage4.png

RecallImage4.png

1439 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

65 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

425 ms

Accessibility Review

nanolokedgerecall.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

nanolokedgerecall.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nanolokedgerecall.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanolokedgerecall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nanolokedgerecall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nanolokedgerecall.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nano Lok Edge Recall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: