Tools & Wizards About Us
nanospr.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

nanospr.com

NanoSPR - Devices and glass plates for surface plasmon resonance

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

nanospr.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nanospr.com now to see the best up-to-date NanoSPR content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nanospr.com

Our company provides optimal solutions Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) technique since 1998. We offer measurement equipment for small laboratories and universities. Our SPR devices allow to run experi...

Visit nanospr.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nanospr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nanospr.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,780 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nanospr.com

40 ms

nanospr.com

2860 ms

js

74 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

94 ms

style.min.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Nanospr.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Nanospr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 54.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

798.1 kB

After Optimization

743.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nanospr.com main page is 798.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 373.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 50.2 kB

  • Original 63.2 kB
  • After minification 63.2 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 373.8 kB
  • After minification 370.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NanoSPR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 339.6 kB
  • After minification 339.6 kB
  • After compression 338.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 21.5 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanospr.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (56%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NanoSPR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nanospr.com

nanospr.com

40 ms

nanospr.com

nanospr.com

2860 ms

js

js

74 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

94 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

114 ms

styles.css

styles.css

97 ms

css

css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

99 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

102 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

95 ms

ios-orientationchange-fix.js

ios-orientationchange-fix.js

191 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

191 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

178 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

185 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1111 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

115 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1112 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

2119 ms

index.js

index.js

2122 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

2152 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

2127 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

3144 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

3149 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

3146 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

3151 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

3155 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

3167 ms

api.js

api.js

68 ms

index.js

index.js

3243 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

3227 ms

style.css

style.css

4054 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

103 ms

search.png

search.png

103 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

88 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

88 ms

google-plus.png

google-plus.png

89 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

80 ms

NanoSPR77_760_395.jpg

NanoSPR77_760_395.jpg

170 ms

nanospr103.jpg

nanospr103.jpg

141 ms

NanoSPR9-2-channel-SPR-device-760x395.jpg

NanoSPR9-2-channel-SPR-device-760x395.jpg

183 ms

Interdigitated-electrodes_760_3951.jpg

Interdigitated-electrodes_760_3951.jpg

169 ms

nanospr8-481_760_395.jpg

nanospr8-481_760_395.jpg

170 ms

NanoSPR77_760_395-332x205.jpg

NanoSPR77_760_395-332x205.jpg

217 ms

syringe-pump-1-channel-332x205.jpg

syringe-pump-1-channel-332x205.jpg

191 ms

8-channel-peristaltic-pump-332x205.jpg

8-channel-peristaltic-pump-332x205.jpg

238 ms

thermo-stabilization-box-332x205.jpg

thermo-stabilization-box-332x205.jpg

243 ms

nanochip-ag-332x205.jpg

nanochip-ag-332x205.jpg

250 ms

NanoSPR9-2-channel-SPR-device-332x205.jpg

NanoSPR9-2-channel-SPR-device-332x205.jpg

847 ms

Interdigitated-electrodes_760_3951-332x205.jpg

Interdigitated-electrodes_760_3951-332x205.jpg

963 ms

Glass_plate_with_evaporated_Au_film_760_395-332x205.jpg

Glass_plate_with_evaporated_Au_film_760_395-332x205.jpg

973 ms

nanospr8-481_760_395-332x205.jpg

nanospr8-481_760_395-332x205.jpg

974 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

51 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

55 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

53 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

53 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

52 ms

Accessibility Review

nanospr.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

nanospr.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nanospr.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanospr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nanospr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nanospr.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of NanoSPR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: