Tools & Wizards About Us
nanoteq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

nanoteq.com

Nanoteq was established in 1988 with the core focus of developing trusted high-level cryptographic technology that can be used in various products and...

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

78 ms

nanoteq.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nanoteq.com homepage info - get ready to check Nanoteq best content for South Africa right away, or after learning these important things about nanoteq.com

Nanoteq was established in 1988 with the core focus of developing trusted high-level cryptographic technology that can be used in various products and solutions.

Visit nanoteq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nanoteq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nanoteq.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nanoteq.com

1637 ms

nanoteq.com

1607 ms

default.css

609 ms

skin.css

915 ms

container.css

1208 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Nanoteq.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Nanoteq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 385.2 kB (62%)

Content Size

618.8 kB

After Optimization

233.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nanoteq.com main page is 618.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 438.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 20.6 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 54.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nanoteq needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 282.8 kB

  • Original 438.8 kB
  • After minification 414.3 kB
  • After compression 156.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 282.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 79.3 kB

  • Original 95.3 kB
  • After minification 76.9 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanoteq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (61%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nanoteq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nanoteq.com

nanoteq.com

1637 ms

nanoteq.com

nanoteq.com

1607 ms

default.css

default.css

609 ms

skin.css

skin.css

915 ms

container.css

container.css

1208 ms

portal.css

portal.css

1218 ms

module.css

module.css

1234 ms

ComboBox.Default.css

ComboBox.Default.css

1247 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2217 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

2802 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

1806 ms

script.js

script.js

1522 ms

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

1855 ms

dnn.js

dnn.js

1863 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

1827 ms

dnn.jquery.js

dnn.jquery.js

2106 ms

ControlPanel.debug.js

ControlPanel.debug.js

2130 ms

dnncore.js

dnncore.js

2161 ms

dnn.modalpopup.js

dnn.modalpopup.js

2171 ms

initWidgets.js

initWidgets.js

2405 ms

ga.js

ga.js

23 ms

Bottom_texture.jpg

Bottom_texture.jpg

308 ms

White_01.png

White_01.png

303 ms

spacer.png

spacer.png

311 ms

White_03.png

White_03.png

310 ms

White_04a.png

White_04a.png

307 ms

lock.jpg

lock.jpg

310 ms

White_06a.png

White_06a.png

603 ms

White_07.png

White_07.png

612 ms

White_09.png

White_09.png

612 ms

sheet_b.png

sheet_b.png

597 ms

sheet_t.png

sheet_t.png

597 ms

sheet.png

sheet.png

599 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

881 ms

header-object.png

header-object.png

895 ms

nav.png

nav.png

896 ms

menuitem.png

menuitem.png

903 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

905 ms

subitem.png

subitem.png

908 ms

White_02.png

White_02.png

1180 ms

White_04bg.png

White_04bg.png

1198 ms

White_05a.png

White_05a.png

1200 ms

White_06bg.png

White_06bg.png

1210 ms

White_08.png

White_08.png

1213 ms

footer.png

footer.png

1217 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

Accessibility Review

nanoteq.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

nanoteq.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nanoteq.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanoteq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nanoteq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nanoteq.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nanoteq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: