Tools & Wizards About Us
nantucketproject.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

nantucketproject.com

tnp 2023 - the nantucket project

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

88 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.7 sec

nantucketproject.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nantucket Project content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nantucketproject.com

tnp(one) will take place on nantucket island on october 5-8, 2023.

Visit nantucketproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nantucketproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nantucketproject.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nantucketproject.com

88 ms

nantucketproject.com

113 ms

pa-frontend-f4e538426.min.css

27 ms

style.min.css

58 ms

simple-banner.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Nantucketproject.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Tnpbigshowlive.wpengine.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Nantucketproject.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (4%)

Content Size

30.3 MB

After Optimization

29.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nantucketproject.com main page is 30.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 29.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 71.6 kB

  • Original 88.6 kB
  • After minification 84.8 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 29.8 MB
  • After minification 28.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nantucket Project images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 284.9 kB
  • After minification 284.9 kB
  • After compression 281.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 121.8 kB
  • After minification 121.8 kB
  • After compression 117.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nantucketproject.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (75%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nantucket Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nantucketproject.com

nantucketproject.com

88 ms

nantucketproject.com

nantucketproject.com

113 ms

pa-frontend-f4e538426.min.css

pa-frontend-f4e538426.min.css

27 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

58 ms

simple-banner.css

simple-banner.css

67 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

71 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

69 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

71 ms

custom-frontend-legacy.min.css

custom-frontend-legacy.min.css

73 ms

custom-frontend.min.css

custom-frontend.min.css

88 ms

post-95.css

post-95.css

86 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

96 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

102 ms

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

132 ms

post-1935.css

post-1935.css

98 ms

post-133.css

post-133.css

107 ms

post-2048.css

post-2048.css

109 ms

public.css

public.css

111 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

121 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

126 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

148 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

149 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

159 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

157 ms

simple-banner.js

simple-banner.js

158 ms

wonderpluginvideoembed.js

wonderpluginvideoembed.js

158 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

157 ms

js

js

71 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

221 ms

pa-frontend-f4e538426.min.js

pa-frontend-f4e538426.min.js

255 ms

8239365.js

8239365.js

99 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

256 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

257 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

258 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

261 ms

headroom.min.js

headroom.min.js

258 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

259 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

259 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

258 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

259 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

241 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

372 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

366 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

365 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

363 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

362 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

361 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

343 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

339 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

337 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

332 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

334 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

326 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

375 ms

hotjar-2455890.js

hotjar-2455890.js

249 ms

TNP_logo_1_RGB_alpha-300x31.png

TNP_logo_1_RGB_alpha-300x31.png

267 ms

44937125651_eda69ebde9_o-scaled.jpg

44937125651_eda69ebde9_o-scaled.jpg

387 ms

Copy-of-Flowers-Audience-TNPONE_SATURDAY-369-scaled.jpeg

Copy-of-Flowers-Audience-TNPONE_SATURDAY-369-scaled.jpeg

435 ms

31076278528_3a9ce99ef1_o-1-scaled.jpg

31076278528_3a9ce99ef1_o-1-scaled.jpg

326 ms

Micah-TNPONE_SATURDAY-85-scaled.jpeg

Micah-TNPONE_SATURDAY-85-scaled.jpeg

387 ms

Copy-of-Cameroons-and-Rainn-TNPONE_SATURDAY-380-scaled.jpeg

Copy-of-Cameroons-and-Rainn-TNPONE_SATURDAY-380-scaled.jpeg

423 ms

TNP-00112.jpeg

TNP-00112.jpeg

695 ms

harbor-TNP-05874.jpeg

harbor-TNP-05874.jpeg

423 ms

names77-687x1024.png

names77-687x1024.png

715 ms

Group-2.png

Group-2.png

412 ms

Group-1.png

Group-1.png

451 ms

Polaris-Medium.ttf

Polaris-Medium.ttf

325 ms

Polaris-Light.ttf

Polaris-Light.ttf

353 ms

Polaris-Bold.ttf

Polaris-Bold.ttf

400 ms

Polaris-Heavy.ttf

Polaris-Heavy.ttf

390 ms

IgTnp-01.png

IgTnp-01.png

770 ms

IgTnp-02.png

IgTnp-02.png

694 ms

IgTnp-03.png

IgTnp-03.png

1083 ms

IgTnp-04.png

IgTnp-04.png

1197 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

511 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

521 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

558 ms

modules.e4b2dc39f985f11fb1e4.js

modules.e4b2dc39f985f11fb1e4.js

77 ms

Accessibility Review

nantucketproject.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nantucketproject.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

nantucketproject.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nantucketproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nantucketproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nantucketproject.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nantucket Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: