10.5 sec in total
3.7 sec
6.1 sec
665 ms
Visit napfe.com now to see the best up-to-date NAPFE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about napfe.com
National Alliance of Postal and Federal Employees (NAPFE). The National Alliance of Postal and Federal Employees is an independent labor Union that is composed of three tiers: the National – headquart...
Visit napfe.comWe analyzed Napfe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.7 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
napfe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value14.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value700 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
3700 ms
383 ms
189 ms
187 ms
296 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Napfe.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Napfe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (41%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Napfe.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NAPFE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 544.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 544.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 255.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Napfe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 255.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (50%)
107
54
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NAPFE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
napfe.com
3700 ms
styles.css
383 ms
modal.css
189 ms
attachments_hide.css
187 ms
attachments_list.css
296 ms
bootstrap.css
350 ms
tmpl.default.css
280 ms
media.1200.css
294 ms
bootstrap.responsive.css
278 ms
media.980.css
370 ms
media.768.css
376 ms
media.480.css
375 ms
style.default.css
361 ms
jasmim.css
372 ms
styles.css
398 ms
settings.css
403 ms
dynamic-captions.css
397 ms
static-captions.css
396 ms
ext.default.css
369 ms
jquery.min.js
501 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
401 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
399 ms
techline.min.js
398 ms
mootools-core.js
465 ms
core.js
385 ms
mootools-more.js
700 ms
modal.js
439 ms
attachments_refresh.js
450 ms
caption.js
452 ms
bootstrap.js
458 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
451 ms
touch.gallery.js
935 ms
scripts.js
933 ms
jquery-scrolltofixed.js
671 ms
bootstrap.min.js
670 ms
techline.min.js
669 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
924 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
925 ms
css
129 ms
css
226 ms
ext.asmenu.css
795 ms
ext.artslider.css
793 ms
style.custom.css
703 ms
script.js
797 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
687 ms
jquery.hovermenu.js
687 ms
napfe-logo.png
101 ms
bg.header.png
88 ms
blank.gif
87 ms
logo.png
88 ms
sl-01.jpg
98 ms
red-bg.jpg
86 ms
napfe-emblem.png
85 ms
sl-02.jpg
100 ms
slides-empty.jpg
114 ms
slice-B.png
100 ms
slice-C.png
98 ms
slice-D.png
96 ms
slice-E.png
101 ms
slice-F.png
239 ms
slice-G.png
100 ms
slice-H.png
100 ms
slice-A.png
128 ms
napfe-logo.png
113 ms
icon-rm2.png
101 ms
icon-hm2.png
101 ms
icon-ml2.png
101 ms
icon-rt2.png
108 ms
icon-lm2.png
110 ms
icon-rl2.png
111 ms
icon-am2.png
122 ms
icon-yc2.png
126 ms
icon-md2.png
123 ms
membership-photo.jpg
123 ms
icon-flag.png
125 ms
icon-9.png
126 ms
icon-magazine.png
127 ms
icon-newsletter.png
131 ms
footer-ad.png
114 ms
bg.png
99 ms
dd.arrow.png
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
77 ms
icomoon-custom.svg
75 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-59U.ttf
63 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZKCM.ttf
360 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meKCM.ttf
63 ms
bg.header.bottom.png
90 ms
li.style.png
90 ms
blockquote.png
91 ms
bg.row6.png
91 ms
all.js
204 ms
plusone.js
273 ms
widgets.js
201 ms
li.style.default.png
185 ms
up.arrow.png
78 ms
bg.gallery.png
77 ms
loader.gif
77 ms
bullets2.png
77 ms
large_left.png
73 ms
large_right.png
75 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
287 ms
all.js
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
104 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
181 ms
fastbutton
175 ms
settings
113 ms
postmessageRelay
91 ms
developers.google.com
382 ms
1832714284-postmessagerelay.js
22 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
18 ms
button.d2f864f87f544dc0c11d7d712a191c1f.js
26 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
embeds
48 ms
tweet_button.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.en.html
39 ms
napfe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
napfe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
napfe.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Napfe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Napfe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
napfe.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NAPFE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: