Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

4.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

667 ms

nas.sa screenshot

About Website

Visit nas.sa now to see the best up-to-date Nas content for Saudi Arabia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nas.sa

Visit nas.sa

Key Findings

We analyzed Nas.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 4.1 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nas.sa performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nas.sa

4113 ms

analytics.js

129 ms

bootstrap.css

178 ms

font-awesome.min.css

133 ms

tinyscrollbar.css

132 ms

Our browser made a total of 169 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (167 requests) were addressed to the original Nas.sa, 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Nas.sa.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (51%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Nas.sa main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 863.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 88.1 kB

  • Original 104.6 kB
  • After minification 101.4 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 863.0 kB
  • After minification 777.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nas images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 667.1 kB

  • Original 855.8 kB
  • After minification 644.9 kB
  • After compression 188.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 667.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 243.6 kB

  • Original 285.6 kB
  • After minification 228.7 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nas.sa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 243.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (13%)

Requests Now

165

After Optimization

143

The browser has sent 165 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nas.sa accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

nas.sa best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nas.sa SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1256

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nas.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Nas.sa main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1256. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nas. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: